Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028541›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Structure-Based Sequence Alignment of the Transmembrane Domains of All Human GPCRs: Phylogenetic, Structural and Functional Implications.

Vaclav Cvicek, William A Goddard, Ravinder Abrol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Origins of GPCRs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Conformational dynamics underlying atypical chemokine receptor 3 activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vaclav CvicekMaterials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
William A GoddardMaterials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Ravinder AbrolMaterials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
California Institute of Technology · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Brain Endothelial Receptor for E. coliR01AI040567 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI DAVIS, MARK E, GODDARD, WILLIAM ANDREW · 2001 to 2015
$5.5M
Maneuvering of Macrophage Function By Escherichia coli K1R01NS073115 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI NEMANI, PRASADARAO V · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI040567NIAID NIH HHS R01AI040567NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073115NINDS NIH HHS R01NS073115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The understanding of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is undergoing a revolution due to increased information about their signaling and the experimental determination of structures for more than 25 receptors. The availability of at least one receptor structure for each of the GPCR classes, well separated in sequence space, enables an integrated superfamily-wide analysis to identify signatures involving the role of conserved residues, conserved contacts, and downstream signaling in the context of receptor structures. In this study, we align the transmembrane (TM) domains of all experimental GPCR structures to maximize the conserved inter-helical contacts. The resulting superfamily-wide GpcR Sequence-Structure (GRoSS) alignment of the TM domains for all human GPCR sequences is sufficient to generate a phylogenetic tree that correctly distinguishes all different GPCR classes, suggesting that the class-level differences in the GPCR superfamily are encoded at least partly in the TM domains. The inter-helical contacts conserved across all GPCR classes describe the evolutionarily conserved GPCR structural fold. The corresponding structural alignment of the inactive and active conformations, available for a few GPCRs, identifies activation hot-spot residues in the TM domains that get rewired upon activation. Many GPCR mutations, known to alter receptor signaling and cause disease, are located at these conserved contact and activation hot-spot residue positions. The GRoSS alignment places the chemosensory receptor subfamilies for bitter taste (TAS2R) and pheromones (Vomeronasal, VN1R) in the rhodopsin family, known to contain the chemosensory olfactory receptor subfamily. The GRoSS alignment also enables the quantification of the structural variability in the TM regions of experimental structures, useful for homology modeling and structure prediction of receptors. Furthermore, this alignment identifies structurally and functionally important residues in all human GPCRs. These residues can be used to make testable hypotheses about the structural basis of receptor function and about the molecular basis of disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceProtein Structure, TertiaryAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularPhylogenyReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID27028541
PMCPMC4814114
OpenAlexW2333157756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.