Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028533›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

Radiation exposure contribution of the scout abdomen radiograph in common pediatric fluoroscopic procedures.

Anil G Rao, Cephus E Simmons, Paul G Thacker, Heather Collins, E Russell Ritenour, Jeanne G Hill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anil G RaoDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. raoa@musc.edu.
Cephus E SimmonsDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Paul G ThackerDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Heather CollinsDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
E Russell RitenourDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Jeanne G HillDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., MSC 323, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContrast enema, voiding cystourethrography and upper gastrointestinal studies are the most common fluoroscopic procedures in children. Scout abdomen radiographs have been routinely obtained prior to fluoroscopy and add to the radiation exposure from these procedures. Elimination of unnecessary routine scout radiographs in select studies might significantly reduce radiation exposure to children and improve the overall benefit-to-risk ratio of these fluoroscopic procedures.

objectiveTo determine the radiation exposure contribution of the preliminary/scout abdomen radiographs with respect to the radiation exposure of the total procedure. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively collected demographic information and radiation exposure values of dose area product (in Gy-cm(2)) and entrance air kerma (in mGy) - initially for the scout abdomen radiographs done prior to fluoroscopy and subsequently the total procedural radiation values (the combined values of the scout radiograph and fluoroscopic radiation exposure) - in children who underwent contrast enemas, voiding cystourethrograms and upper gastrointestinal studies in a 4-month period. The radiation parameters, including fluoroscopy time, dose area product and entrance air kerma, were available in the log book maintained in the fluoroscopy suite. Fluoroscopy procedures were performed on a single fluoroscopy machine using four frames per second pulse rate and other radiation-minimizing techniques. Usage of the grid to obtain scout radiographs was also recorded. The proportion of radiation exposure from the scout radiograph relative to that of the total procedure was calculated by dividing the individual parameters of the scout to the total procedural values and multiplied by 100 to express these values as a percentage. We calculated mean, median and range and performed statistical analysis of the data.

resultsA total of 151 procedures performed on 71 males and 80 females qualified for the study. The age range of the patients was 2 days to 18 years, with a mean of nearly 3.5 years (40 months) and median of 15 months. There were 63 upper gastrointestinal studies, 65 voiding cystourethrography studies and 23 contrast enema studies. The fluoroscopy time for all procedures combined ranged from 0.1 min (6 s) to 2 min, with mean and median values of 0.4 min and 0.3 min, respectively. The fractional radiation exposure contribution for the dose area product of scout abdomen radiograph to the total procedure ranged from 4% to 98%, with mean and median values of 51% and 49%, respectively. The fractional contribution of the scout radiograph to the total procedure for the entrance air kerma values ranged from 6% to 97%, with mean and median values of 29% and 26%, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation (P<0.001) between fluoroscopy radiation time and the proportion of radiation parameters of scout radiograph to total procedural values.

conclusionScout radiographs can contribute a significant proportion (median values of approximately 50% for the dose area product and 26% for the entrance air kerma) of radiation exposure in common fluoroscopy procedures in children.

Indexed as

Radiation ExposureAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaEnemaFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRadiography, AbdominalRetrospective StudiesUrographyContrast MediaChildrenContrast enemaFluoroscopyRadiation doseScout radiographUpper gastrointestinal seriesVoiding cystourethrogram

Identifiers

PMID27028533
OpenAlexW2327253676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.