Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028405›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Establishment and Biological Characterization of a Panel of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) and GBM Variant Oncosphere Cell Lines.

Zev A Binder, Kelli M Wilson, Vafi Salmasi, Brent A Orr, Charles G Eberhart, I-Mei Siu, Michael Lim, Jon D Weingart, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, Chetan Bettegowda and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. PamInvestigational new drugs · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zev A BinderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Kelli M WilsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Vafi SalmasiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Brent A OrrDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Charles G EberhartDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
I-Mei SiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Michael LimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Jon D WeingartDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Alfredo Quinones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Chetan BettegowdaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Amin B KassamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aurora Neuroscience Innovation Institute, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Alessandro OliviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Henry BremDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Gregory J RigginsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Gary L GalliaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USAurora Health Care · US

Funding

T32: Predoctoral and Postdoctoral Training Program in Nanotechnology for Cancer ResearchT32CA153952 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Denis Wirtz · 2015 to 2026
$3.5M
Role of NKCC1 on Brain Tumor Stem Cell Migration After EGF and Slit-2 StimulationR01NS070024 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI QUINONES-HINOJOSA, ALFREDO · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
T-32 NIH Postdoctoral Training Program in Nanotechnology for Cancer Medicine NTCMT32CA130840 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, DENIS · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA130840NCI NIH HHS T32CA130840NCI NIH HHS T32 CA153952NINDS NIH HHS 5R01NS070024NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHuman tumor cell lines form the basis of the majority of present day laboratory cancer research. These models are vital to studying the molecular biology of tumors and preclinical testing of new therapies. When compared to traditional adherent cell lines, suspension cell lines recapitulate the genetic profiles and histologic features of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with higher fidelity. Using a modified neural stem cell culture technique, here we report the characterization of GBM cell lines including GBM variants.

methodsTumor tissue samples were obtained intra-operatively and cultured in neural stem cell conditions containing growth factors. Tumor lines were characterized in vitro using differentiation assays followed by immunostaining for lineage-specific markers. In vivo tumor formation was assayed by orthotopic injection in nude mice. Genetic uniqueness was confirmed via short tandem repeat (STR) DNA profiling.

resultsThirteen oncosphere lines derived from GBM and GBM variants, including a GBM with PNET features and a GBM with oligodendroglioma component, were established. All unique lines showed distinct genetic profiles by STR profiling. The lines assayed demonstrated a range of in vitro growth rates. Multipotency was confirmed using in vitro differentiation. Tumor formation demonstrated histologic features consistent with high grade gliomas, including invasion, necrosis, abnormal vascularization, and high mitotic rate. Xenografts derived from the GBM variants maintained histopathological features of the primary tumors.

conclusionsWe have generated and characterized GBM suspension lines derived from patients with GBMs and GBM variants. These oncosphere cell lines will expand the resources available for preclinical study.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorAdultAgedAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCryopreservationFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMice, NudeMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedNeoplasm TransplantationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27028405
PMCPMC4814135
OpenAlexW2322758932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.