Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028350›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2017

Oncologic and Functional Hazards of Obesity Among Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy.

In J Park, Y Nancy You, John M Skibber, Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas, Prajnan Das, Cathy Eng, Scott Kopetz, Robert A Wolff, Christopher H Crane, Sunil Krishnan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

In J ParkDepartments of *Surgical Oncology †Radiation Oncology ‡Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Y Nancy You
John M Skibber
Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas
Prajnan Das
Cathy Eng
Scott Kopetz
Robert A Wolff
Christopher H Crane
Sunil Krishnan
Bruce Minsky
Chung-Yuan Hu
Sa Nguyen
George J Chang
Society of Surgical Oncology · USRadiation Oncology Associates · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Optimizing Treatment of Rectal Cancer Using a Markov Decision ModelK07CA133187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, GEORGE J · 2009 to 2013
$853k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA133187NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveObesity is a major health concern and risk factor for colorectal cancer that may also impact cancer treatment and outcomes. Rectal cancer response to chemoradiotherapy (CXRT) is associated with long-term survival and sphincter preservation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of obesity on treatment outcomes after neoadjuvant CXRT for rectal cancer.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed (1993 to 2010) with cT3-4 or cN+ (by endorectal ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) rectal carcinoma and treated with CXRT and total mesorectal excision was performed. Patients were classified as obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m) or nonobese (body mass index <30 kg/m), and by response to CXRT: complete (pCR) or incomplete (pIR). Associations between obesity, tumor response, and sphincter preservation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and survival outcomes by Cox regression.

resultsA total of 753 patients met criteria and 28.7% (n=216) patients were obese. Obese and nonobese groups did not differ in age, sex, tumor location, grade, or number of examined lymph nodes. However, obesity was associated with a lower rate of pCR (ORmulti=0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.94; P=0.04) and among mid to low rectal cancer patients, a lower rate of sphincter preservation (ORmulti=0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.99). Among both obese and nonobese patients, CR was associated with more favorable recurrence-free survival than pIR.

conclusionsConsidering the increasing obesity prevalence and its association with CXRT response, oncologic outcomes, and sphincter preservation, further study is needed regarding the impact of obesity on neoadjuvant treatment response. Moreover, obesity should be targeted as a modifiable risk factor for adverse outcomes following multimodality treatment for rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedAnal CanalBody Mass IndexCarcinomaChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyObesityOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27028350
PMCPMC5042800
OpenAlexW2320643835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.