SynthesisObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2016
Weight change among people randomized to minimal intervention control groups in weight loss trials.
Synthesis in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of weight-loss interventions on psoriasis severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Physical Activity-Promoting Web- and Mobile-Based Distance Weight Loss Interventions on Body Composition in Rehabilitation Settings: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-Regression Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Randomised controlled trial of breast cancer and multiple disease prevention weight loss programmes vs written advice amongst women attending a breast cancer family history clinic.British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- POWERSforID: Personalized online weight and exercise response system for individuals with intellectual disability: A randomized controlled trial.Disability and health journal · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Greater Attendance at a Community Weight Loss Programme over the First 12 Weeks Predicts Weight Loss at 2 Years.Obesity facts · 2020Trial
- A Single Motivational Lecture Can Promote Modest Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity facts · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A smartphone based attentive eating intervention for energy intake and weight loss: results from a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- Effectiveness of Nutrition Intervention in a Selected Group of Overweight and Obese African-American Preschoolers.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2018Trial
- Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities: A Community-Based Randomized Trial for Rural Women.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2018Trial
- A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Technology-Based Weight Loss Interventions among Endometrial Cancer Survivors.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2017Trial
- Extended and standard duration weight-loss programme referrals for adults in primary care (WRAP): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2017Trial
- A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2017Trial
- Three-Year Follow-Up of Participants from a Self-Weighing Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of obesity · 2017Trial
- A randomised controlled trial of a low-carbohydrate digitally-supported weight loss programme for type 2 diabetes.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A controlled weight loss intervention study among women of Somali background in Norway.Journal of migration and health · 2024Article
- Weight regain after behavioural weight management programmes and its impact on quality of life and cost effectiveness: Evidence synthesis and health economic analyses.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEvidence on the effectiveness of behavioral weight management programs often comes from uncontrolled program evaluations. These frequently make the assumption that, without intervention, people will gain weight. The aim of this study was to use data from minimal intervention control groups in randomized controlled trials to examine the evidence for this assumption and the effect of frequency of weighing on weight change.
methodsData were extracted from minimal intervention control arms in a systematic review of multicomponent behavioral weight management programs. Two reviewers classified control arms into three categories based on intensity of minimal intervention and calculated 12-month mean weight change using baseline observation carried forward. Meta-regression was conducted in STATA v12.
resultsThirty studies met the inclusion criteria, twenty-nine of which had usable data, representing 5,963 participants allocated to control arms. Control arms were categorized according to intensity, as offering leaflets only, a single session of advice, or more than one session of advice from someone without specialist skills in supporting weight loss. Mean weight change at 12 months across all categories was -0.8 kg (95% CI -1.1 to -0.4). In an unadjusted model, increasing intensity by moving up a category was associated with an additional weight loss of -0.53 kg (95% CI -0.96 to -0.09). Also in an unadjusted model, each additional weigh-in was associated with a weight change of -0.42 kg (95% CI -0.81 to -0.03). However, when both variables were placed in the same model, neither intervention category nor number of weigh-ins was associated with weight change.
conclusionsUncontrolled evaluations of weight loss programs should assume that, in the absence of intervention, their population would weigh up to a kilogram on average less than baseline at the end of the first year of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.