SynthesisPloS one2016
Economic Benefits of Investing in Women's Health: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Gender innovation in the scientific evidence on interventions to reduce health inequalities in Europe: an umbrella review.International journal for equity in health · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on mental health among women of reproductive age - a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Utilising quantitative methods to study the intersectionality of multiple social disadvantages in women with common mental disorders: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of the effects of intimate partner violence on HIV-positive pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies in women of childbearing age in the Middle East and North Africa, 2000-2018.Systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Gender inequality in the impact of climate shock on physical health and its spillover effect.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Factors associated with married adolescent girls' and young women's participation in decision-making regarding sexual and reproductive health in Tanzania: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Faith, Culture, and Choice: Unraveling the Determinants of Modern Contraceptive Use Among Married Women in Garbatula Sub-County, Kenya.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- A Crowdsourced Topic Map and Future Research Agenda for Women's Health.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Unwrapping the Global Financing Facility: understanding implications for women's children's and adolescent's health through layered policy analysis.Global health action · 2025Review
- Iran's progress in reducing maternal mortality: an analysis of policies and interventions using the who's six building blocks and universal health coverage approach.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Effects of a gender-responsive maternal, newborn and child health program on health and economic outcomes during COVID-19 in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- The economics of investing in women and health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- From population goals to reproductive health autonomy: Reframing India's fertility transition.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Menstrual Disorders in Korean Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Challenges in Providing Gynecological Procedures in Primary Care: A Survey of Canadian Academic Family Physicians.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness results comparing heat-stable carbetocin & other uterotonics in postpartum heamorrhage prevention in Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- The sexual and reproductive health knowledge of women in Australia: A scoping review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, the status of women's health falls short of its potential. In addition to the deleterious ethical and human rights implications of this deficit, the negative economic impact may also be consequential, but these mechanisms are poorly understood. Building on the literature that highlights health as a driver of economic growth and poverty alleviation, we aim to systematically investigate the broader economic benefits of investing in women's health.
methodsUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed health, gender, and economic literature to identify studies that investigate the impact of women's health on micro- and macroeconomic outcomes. We developed an extensive search algorithm and conducted searches using 10 unique databases spanning the timeframe 01/01/1970 to 01/04/2013. Articles were included if they reported on economic impacts stemming from changes in women's health (table of outcome measures included in full review, Table 1). In total, the two lead investigators independently screened 20,832 abstracts and extracted 438 records for full text review. The final review reflects the inclusion of 124 articles.
resultsThe existing literature indicates that healthier women and their children contribute to more productive and better-educated societies. This study documents an extensive literature confirming that women's health is tied to long-term productivity: the development and economic performance of nations depends, in part, upon how each country protects and promotes the health of women. Providing opportunities for deliberate family planning; healthy mothers before, during, and after childbirth, and the health and productivity of subsequent generations can catalyze a cycle of positive societal development.
conclusionsThis review highlights the untapped potential of initiatives that aim to address women's health. Societies that prioritize women's health will likely have better population health overall, and will remain more productive for generations to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.