Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028127›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2016

Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a laboratory study.

Caroline Praz, Benedikt Fasel, Philippe Vuistiner, Kamiar Aminian, Bengt Kayser

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Ski Mountaineering: A Laboratory-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline PrazDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Lausanne, Géopolis, Campus Dorigny, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Benedikt FaselLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IBI-STI, ELH 134, Station 11, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe VuistinerInstitute for Research in Rehabilitation, SuvaCare Rehabilitation Clinic, Avenue Grand-Champsec 90, 1950, Sion, Switzerland.
Kamiar AminianLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, EPFL STI IBI-GE ELH 132, Station 11, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bengt KayserDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Lausanne, Géopolis, Campus Dorigny, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. bengt.kayser@unil.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to estimate the energy cost of linear (EC) and vertical displacement (ECvert), mechanical efficiency and main stride parameters during simulated ski mountaineering at different speeds and gradients, to identify an optimal speed and gradient that maximizes performance.

methods12 subjects roller skied on a treadmill at three different inclines (10, 17 and 24 %) at three different speeds (approximately 70, 80 and 85 % of estimated peak heart rate). Energy expenditure was calculated by indirect calorimetry, while biomechanical parameters were measured with an inertial sensor-based system.

resultsAt 10 % there was no significant change with speed in EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency. At 17 and 24 % the fastest speed was significantly more economical. There was a significant effect of gradient on EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency. The most economical gradient was the steepest one. There was a significant increase of stride frequency with speed. At steep gradients only, relative thrust phase duration decreased significantly, while stride length increased significantly with speed. There was a significant effect of gradient on stride length (decrease with steepness) and relative thrust phase duration (increase with steepness).

conclusionA combination of a decreased relative thrust phase duration with increased stride length and frequency decreases ECvert. To minimize the energy expenditure to reach the top of a mountain and to optimize performance, ski-mountaineers should choose a steep gradient (~24 %) and, provided they possess sufficient metabolic scope, combine it with a fast speed (~6 km h(-1)).

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaEnergy MetabolismExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMountaineeringPhysical EnduranceSkiingBiomechanicsEnduranceEnergy expenditureSkiing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.