ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2016
Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a laboratory study.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use, Validity and Reliability of Inertial Movement Units in Volleyball: Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Biomechanical comparison of pin and freeride ski mountaineering bindings in recreational skiers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Effect of a four-week isocaloric ketogenic diet on physical performance at very high-altitude: a pilot study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the physiology of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Exceptional Performance in Competitive Ski Mountaineering: An Inertial Sensor Case Study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the kinematics and kinetics of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Assessment of Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Ski Mountaineering: A Laboratory-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Ski Mountaineering: Perspectives on a Novel Sport to Be Introduced at the 2026 Winter Olympic Games.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Steeper or Faster? Tactical Dispositions to Minimize Oxygen Cost in Ski Mountaineering.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- In-Field Validation of an Inertial Sensor-Based System for Movement Analysis and Classification in Ski Mountaineering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study.European journal of applied physiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to estimate the energy cost of linear (EC) and vertical displacement (ECvert), mechanical efficiency and main stride parameters during simulated ski mountaineering at different speeds and gradients, to identify an optimal speed and gradient that maximizes performance.
methods12 subjects roller skied on a treadmill at three different inclines (10, 17 and 24 %) at three different speeds (approximately 70, 80 and 85 % of estimated peak heart rate). Energy expenditure was calculated by indirect calorimetry, while biomechanical parameters were measured with an inertial sensor-based system.
resultsAt 10 % there was no significant change with speed in EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency. At 17 and 24 % the fastest speed was significantly more economical. There was a significant effect of gradient on EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency. The most economical gradient was the steepest one. There was a significant increase of stride frequency with speed. At steep gradients only, relative thrust phase duration decreased significantly, while stride length increased significantly with speed. There was a significant effect of gradient on stride length (decrease with steepness) and relative thrust phase duration (increase with steepness).
conclusionA combination of a decreased relative thrust phase duration with increased stride length and frequency decreases ECvert. To minimize the energy expenditure to reach the top of a mountain and to optimize performance, ski-mountaineers should choose a steep gradient (~24 %) and, provided they possess sufficient metabolic scope, combine it with a fast speed (~6 km h(-1)).
Indexed as
Identifiers
27028127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.