Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028096›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2016

Empowering Change Agents in Hierarchical Organizations: Participatory Action Research in Prisons.

Janice Penrod, Susan J Loeb, Robert A Ladonne, Lea M Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janice PenrodProfessor, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA 16802.
Susan J LoebAssociate Professor, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Robert A LadonneCommunity Partner, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Lea M MartinCommunity Partner, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Funding

Infusing End-of-Life Care into Complex Organizations: The Prison StudyR01NR011874 · NINR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI HOLLENBEAK, CHRISTOPHER S, LOEB, SUSAN JAYNE · 2009 to 2011
$1.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory action research (PAR) approaches harness collaborative partnerships to stimulate change in defined communities. The purpose of this article is to illustrate key methodological strategies used in the application of PAR methods in the particularly challenging environment of a hierarchical organization. A study designed to promote sustainable, insider-generated system-level changes in the provision of end-of-life (EOL) care in the restrictive setting of six state prisons is used as an exemplar of the application of three cardinal principles of PAR. First, development of a collaborative network with active partnership between outsider academic researchers and insider co-researchers began with careful attention to understanding the culture and processes of prisons and gaining the support of organizational leadership, using qualitative data gathering and trust-building. During the implementation phase, promoting co-ownership of change in EOL care through the co-construction of knowledge and systems to enhance sustainable change required carefully-orchestrated strategies to maximize the collaborative spirit of the project. Co-researchers were empowered to examine their worlds and capture opportunities for change using new leadership skills role-modeled by the research team. Third, their local knowledge of the barriers inherent in the contextual reality of prisons was translated into achievable system change by production of a toolkit of formalized and well-rehearsed change strategies that collaborative teams were empowered to enact within their hierarchical prison environment. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchOrganizational InnovationPower, PsychologicalCooperative BehaviorHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInterviews as TopicMalePrisonersPrisonsTerminal Carecommunity-based participatory researchdeath and dyingprisonssystems research

Identifiers

PMID27028096
PMCPMC5721524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.