ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene2016
Refinement of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique into the Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0).
Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the Tier 3 NIOSH occupational exposure banding process for the graphene family of nanomaterials: A case study.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2025Article
- Safe(r)-by-design principles in the thermoplastics industry: guidance on release assessment during manufacture of nano-enabled products.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations.Safety and health at work · 2023Review
- Application of Inorganic Nanomaterials in Cultural Heritage Conservation, Risk of Toxicity, and Preventive Measures.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Multi-instrument assessment of fine and ultrafine titanium dioxide aerosols.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2023Article
- Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Occupational Safety Analysis for COVID-Instigated Repurposed Manufacturing Lines: Use of Nanomaterials in Injection Moulding.Polymers · 2022Article
- Nanomaterials, a New Challenge in the Workplace.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of enhanced darkfield microscopy and hyperspectral imaging for rapid screening of TiOMicroscopy research and technique · 2021Article
- Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials: a Review of Workplace Exposure Assessment Methods.Current environmental health reports · 2021Review
- Exposure characterization and risk assessment of ultrafine particles from the blast furnace process in a steelmaking plant.Journal of occupational health · 2021Article
- Risk Management Framework for Nano-Biomaterials Used in Medical Devices and Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Exposures during wet production and use processes of nanomaterials: a summary of 11 worksite evaluations.Industrial health · 2020Article
- Evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of carbon nanotube and carbon nanofiber aerosols.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2019Article
- Biological monitoring of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials.Toxicology letters · 2018Review
- Exposure to airborne particles associated with the handling of graphene nanoplatelets.La Medicina del lavoro · 2018Article
- Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2017Review
- 'Safe handling of nanotechnology' ten years on.Nature nanotechnology · 2016Article
- NIOSH field studies team assessment: Worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor fabrication facility.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engineered nanomaterial emission and exposure characterization studies have been completed at more than 60 different facilities by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). These experiences have provided NIOSH the opportunity to refine an earlier published technique, the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT 1.0), into a more comprehensive technique for assessing worker and workplace exposures to engineered nanomaterials. This change is reflected in the new name Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0) which distinguishes it from NEAT 1.0. NEAT 2.0 places a stronger emphasis on time-integrated, filter-based sampling (i.e., elemental mass analysis and particle morphology) in the worker's breathing zone (full shift and task specific) and area samples to develop job exposure matrices. NEAT 2.0 includes a comprehensive assessment of emissions at processes and job tasks, using direct-reading instruments (i.e., particle counters) in data-logging mode to better understand peak emission periods. Evaluation of worker practices, ventilation efficacy, and other engineering exposure control systems and risk management strategies serve to allow for a comprehensive exposure assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.