Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27027431›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2016

p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) expression correlates with prognosis in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fang Fang, Jian Pan, Yi-Ping Li, Gang Li, Li-Xiao Xu, Guang-Hao Su, Zhi-Heng Li, Xing Feng, Jian Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. p21-Activated Kinase 1 Promotes Breast TumorigenesisFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Targeting Rac and Cdc42 GEFs in Metastatic Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fang FangInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Jian PanInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Yi-Ping LiInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Gang LiInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Li-Xiao XuInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Guang-Hao SuInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Zhi-Heng LiInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Xing FengInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Jian WangInstitute of Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215025, Jiangsu, China.
Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p21 protein (Cdc42/Rac)-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) expression appears to be predictive of prognosis in various solid tumors, though the evidence is not yet conclusive. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between PAK1 and prognosis in patients with solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched in several widely used databases, and 15 studies (3068 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of the association between PAK1 and prognosis. Associations between PAK1 expression and prognosis were observed for overall survival (HR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.07-7.39) and disease-specific survival (HR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.47-3.16). No such association was detected for time to tumor progression (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.99-3.21).Our meta-analysis thus indicates that PAK1 expression may be a predictive marker of overall survival and disease-specific survival in patients with solid tumors.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalHumansNeoplasmsp21-Activated KinasesPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumorp21-Activated KinasesPAK1 protein, humanmeta-analysisPAK1prognosissolid tumorsurvival

Identifiers

PMID27027431
PMCPMC5053660
OpenAlexW2323310538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.