Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27027313›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung cancer:Proposal for a scoring model using imaging and demographic characteristics.

Ali Sabri, Madiha Batool, Zhaolin Xu, Drew Bethune, Mohamed Abdolell, Daria Manos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali SabriDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Victoria Building, room 307, 1276 South Park Street, PO BOX 9000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada. sabri.ali@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-1770
Madiha BatoolDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Victoria Building, room 307, 1276 South Park Street, PO BOX 9000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Zhaolin XuDepartment of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Drew BethuneDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, QEII Health Sciences center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mohamed AbdolellDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Victoria Building, room 307, 1276 South Park Street, PO BOX 9000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Daria ManosDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Victoria Building, room 307, 1276 South Park Street, PO BOX 9000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if a combination of CT and demographic features can predict EGFR mutation status in bronchogenic carcinoma.

methodsWe reviewed demographic and CT features for patients with molecular profiling for resected non-small cell lung carcinoma. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified features predictive of EGFR mutation. Prognostic factors identified from the logistic regression model were then used to build a more practical scoring system.

resultsA scoring system awarding 5 points for no or minimal smoking history, 3 points for tumours with ground glass component, 3 points for airbronchograms, 2 points for absence of preoperative evidence of nodal enlargement or metastases and 1 point for doubling time of more than a year, resulted in an AUROC of 0.861. A total score of at least 8 yielded a specificity of 95 %. On multivariate analysis sex was not found to be predictor of EGFR status.

conclusionsA weighted scoring system combining imaging and demographic data holds promise as a predictor of EGFR status. Further studies are necessary to determine reproducibility in other patient groups. A predictive score may help determine which patients would benefit from molecular profiling and may help inform treatment decisions when molecular profiling is not possible. KEY POINTS: • EGFR mutation-targeted chemotherapy for bronchogenic carcinoma has a high success rate. • Mutation testing is not possible in all patients. • EGFR associations include subsolid density, slow tumour growth and minimal/no smoking history. • Demographic or imaging features alone are weak predictors of EGFR status. • A scoring system, using imaging and demographic features, is more predictive.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDemographyErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesErbB ReceptorsAdenocarcinomaEGFRGene mutationLung cancerScoring model

Identifiers

PMID27027313
OpenAlexW2319518956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.