ArticleSpringerPlus2016
Canadian CT head rule and New Orleans Criteria in mild traumatic brain injury: comparison at a tertiary referral hospital in Japan.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05285774 (Interest in the Implementation of a Systematic Protocol for the Dosage of the S100B Protein in the Reduction of the Use of Brain Scans for Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Room of Douai Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interest in the Implementation of a Systematic Protocol for the Dosage of the S100B Protein in the Reduction of the Use of Brain Scans for Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Room of Douai Hospital
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of the goliat score to predict 48-hour complications after minor/moderate traumatic brain injury in the emergency department: a single-center cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A Prehospital Triage System to Detect Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Machine Learning Algorithms.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- A proposed amendment to the current guidelines for mild traumatic brain injury: reducing computerized tomographies while maintaining safety.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021Article
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: Are Routine Second cCT Scans Necessary?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Checklist for Head Injury Management Evaluation Study (CHIMES): a quality improvement initiative to reduce imaging utilisation for head injuries in the emergency department.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- Accuracy of Canadian CT Head Rule and New Orleans Criteria for Minor Head Trauma; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2020Review
- ACEP's Recommendations for Brain Computed Tomography Scan in Adult Minor Head Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2020Article
- The Applicability of New Orleans Criteria for Head Computed Tomography in Inpatient Falls With Injury.The Neurohospitalist · 2019Article
- [Mild head injury].Surgical neurology international · 2018Article
- Computed Tomography Profile and its Utilization in Head Injury Patients in Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared Canadian computed tomography (CT) head rule (CCHR) and New Orleans Criteria (NOC) in predicting important CT findings in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We included 142 consecutive patients with mild TBI [Glasgow coma scale (GCS) 13-15] who showed at least one of the risk factors stated in the CCHR or the NOC. We introduced two scores: a Canadian from the CCHR and a New Orleans from the NOC. A patient's score represented a sum of the number of positive items. We examined the relationship between scores or items and the presence of important CT findings. Only the Canadian was significantly associated with important CT findings in multivariate analyses and showed higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) either in all 142 patients (GCS 13-15: P = 0.0130; AUC = 0.69) or in the 67 with a GCS = 15 (P = 0.0128, AUC = 0.73). Of items, ">60 years" or "≥65 years" included in either guideline was the strongest predictor of important CT finding, followed by "GCS < 15 after 2 h" included only in the CCHR. In a tertiary referral hospital in Japan, CCHR had higher performance than the NOC in predicting important CT findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.