Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026707›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2016

The G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Agonist G-1 Inhibits Nuclear Estrogen Receptor Activity and Stimulates Novel Phosphoproteomic Signatures.

L Cody Smith, Kimberly J Ralston-Hooper, P Lee Ferguson, Tara Sabo-Attwood

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. 17Cancers · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Crosstalk between nuclear and G protein-coupled estrogen receptors.General and comparative endocrinology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L Cody Smith*Department of Physiological Sciences, Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611;
Kimberly J Ralston-HooperDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
P Lee FergusonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Tara Sabo-AttwoodDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611; sabo@phhp.ufl.edu.
Duke University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Xenoestrogen Stress: A Proteomic and Functional Genomic ApproachR21ES016617 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FERGUSON, P. LEE · 2009 to 2010
$378k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES016617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen exerts cellular effects through both nuclear (ESR1 and ESR2) and membrane-bound estrogen receptors (G-protein coupled estrogen receptor, GPER); however, it is unclear if they act independently or engage in crosstalk to influence hormonal responses. To investigate each receptor's role in proliferation, transcriptional activation, and protein phosphorylation in breast cancer cells (MCF-7), we employed selective agonists for ESR1 propyl-pyrazole-triol (PPT), ESR2 diarylpropionitrile (DPN), and GPER (G-1) and also determined the impact of xenoestrogens bisphenol-A (BPA) and genistein on these effects. As anticipated, 17β-estradiol (E2), PPT, DPN, BPA, and genistein each enhanced proliferation and activation of an ERE-driven reporter gene whereas G-1 had no significant impact. However, G-1 significantly reduced E2-, PPT-, DPN-, BPA-, and genistein-induced proliferation and ERE activation at doses greater than 500 nM indicating that G-1 mediated inhibition is not ESR isotype specific. As membrane receptors initiate cascades of phosphorylation events, we performed a global phosphoproteomic analysis on cells exposed to E2 or G-1 to identify potential targets of receptor crosstalk via downstream protein phosphorylation targets. Of the 211 phosphorylated proteins identified, 40 and 13 phosphoproteins were specifically modified by E2 and G-1, respectively. Subnetwork enrichment analysis revealed several processes related to cell cycle were specifically enriched by G-1 compared with E2. Further there existed a number of newly identified proteins that were specifically phosphorylated by G-1. These phosphorylation networks highlight specific proteins that may modulate the inhibitory effects of G-1 and suggest a novel role for interference with nuclear receptor activity driven by E2 and xenoestrogens.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCyclopentanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstradiolGenisteinHumansMCF-7 CellsNitrilesPhenolsPhosphoproteinsPropionates1-(4-(6-bromobenzo(1,3)dioxol-5-yl)-3a,4,5,9b-tetrahydro-3H-cyclopenta(c)quinolin-8-yl)ethanone2,3-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionitrile4,4',4''-(4-propyl-((1)H)-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl) tris-phenolAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsCyclopentanesEstradiolGenisteinGPER1 protein, humanNitrilesPhenolsPhosphoproteinsPropionatesPyrazolesQuinolinesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledestrogenestrogen receptorG-1GPERphosphoproteomicxenoestrogens

Identifiers

PMID27026707
PMCPMC4880142
OpenAlexW2317969992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.