Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026677›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2016

Clinical Trials of Antiangiogenesis Therapy in Recurrent/Persistent and Metastatic Cervical Cancer.

Jill K Alldredge, Krishnansu S Tewari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Upregulation of LRRC8A by mInternational journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jill K AlldredgeUniversity of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
Krishnansu S TewariUniversity of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA ktewari@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
INSTITUTIONAL NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDT32CA060396 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BRISTOW, ROBERT EDWARD · 1994 to 2020
$4.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment options for women with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer are limited and thus the disease portends a poor prognosis. It is critical to understand the pathophysiology of cervical cancer to better delineate therapeutic targets. The development of antiangiogenic therapies and their subsequent analysis in rigorous therapeutic trials have redefined current management strategies and is an exciting area of current exploration.

resultsTranslational trials have furthered the understanding of molecular determinants of angiogenesis. Phase II trials have shown promising trends with developing antiangiogenic therapies. A practice-changing phase III trial has recently been published. Given the potential benefits and different toxicity spectrum compared with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy, antiangiogenic options are under active investigation for this vulnerable patient population. Emerging data are promising for other antiangiogenic-directed therapeutics, as well as cervical cancer molecular biomarkers to guide diagnosis and treatment.

conclusionAntiangiogenic therapies have evolved during the past 20 years and remain an exciting area of current exploration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding of the angiogenic microenvironment has furthered understanding of tumor biology and management. Antiangiogenic therapies show promise for women with advanced cervical cancer. A review of the evolution of these biologic agents shows them to be an effective and tolerable management strategy for many patients in this vulnerable population, with exciting future potential.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabClinical Trials as TopicCyclohexanesFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalO-(Chloroacetylcarbamoyl)fumagillolPrognosisSesquiterpenesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabCyclohexanesO-(Chloroacetylcarbamoyl)fumagillolSesquiterpenesAngiogenesis inhibitorsAntiangiogenesis therapyBiological markersBiomarkersCervical cancerClinical trialsUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27026677
PMCPMC4861362
OpenAlexW2331306877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.