Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026614›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Patients, care partners, and shared access to the patient portal: online practices at an integrated health system.

Jennifer L Wolff, Andrea Berger, Deserae Clarke, Jamie A Green, Rebecca Stametz, Christina Yule, Jonathan D Darer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03283553 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Involving Family to Improve Communication in Breast Cancer Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsRan2017 to 2019Enrolled132ConditionsActive Breast Cancer TreatmentArmsChecklist, MyChart, OpenNotes, Usual Care
NCT04593472 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Sharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2020 to 2025Enrolled273ConditionsCognitive ImpairmentArmsSharing Healthcare Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE), Minimally Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Relationship between adult and family supporter health literacy levels and supporter roles in diabetes management.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Use of the patient portal among older adults with diagnosed dementia and their care partners.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L WolffAssociate Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Room 692, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA jwolff@jhsph.edu.
Andrea BergerBiostatistical Analyst, Center for Health Research, Geisinger Health System, 100 N Academy Drive, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Deserae ClarkeManager, Implementation, Research, and EvaluationCenter for Clinical Innovation, Geisinger Institute for Advanced Application, 100 N Academy Drive, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Jamie A GreenClinical Investigator, Center for Health Research, Geisinger Health System, 100 N Academy Drive, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Rebecca StametzAdministrative Director, Innovation, Research, and EvaluationCenter for Clinical Innovation, Geisinger Institute for Advanced Application, 100 N Academy Drive, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Christina YuleImplementation, Research, and Evaluation CoordinatorCenter for Clinical Innovation, Geisinger Institute for Advanced Application, 100 N Academy Drive, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Jonathan D DarerChief Innovation Officer, Director, Center for Clinical Innovation, Geisinger Institute for Advanced Application, 100 N Academy Drive, Danville, PA 17822, USA (Since 9/2015, Chief Medical Officer, Medicalis, 508 Riverbend Drive, Kitchener, ON N2K 3S2).
Geisinger Medical Center · USGeisinger Health System · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the characteristics and online practices of patients and "care partners" who share explicit access to a patient portal account at a large integrated health system that implemented shared access functionality in 2003. MATERIALS AND

methodsSurvey of 323 patients and 389 care partners at Geisinger Health System with linked information regarding access and use of patient portal functionality.

resultsFew (0.4%) registered adult patient portal users shared access to their account. Patients varied in age (range: 18-102); more than half had a high school education or less (53.6%). Patient motivations for sharing access included: to help manage care (41.9%), for emergency reasons (29.7%), lack of technology experience (18.4%), or care partner request (10.0%). Care partners were parents (39.8%), adult children (27.9%), spouses (26.2%), and other relatives (6.1%). Patients were more likely than care partners to have inadequate health literacy (54.8% versus 8.8%, P < .001) and less confident in their ability to manage their care (53.0% versus 88.1%; P < .001). Care partners were more likely than patients to perform health management activities electronically (95.5% versus 48.4%; P < .001), access the patient portal (89.2% versus 30.3%; P < .001), and use patient portal functionality such as secure messaging (39.6% versus 13.9%; P < .001). Care partners used their own credentials (89.1%) and patient credentials (23.3%) to access the patient portal. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionShared access is an underused strategy that may bridge patients' health literacy deficits and lack of technology experience and that helps but does not fully resolve concerns regarding patient and care partner identity credentials.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient PortalsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMiddle AgedPatientsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultconsumer health informationelectronic health recordshealth information technologyhealth literacy

Identifiers

PMID27026614
PMCPMC11960767
OpenAlexW2324445970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.