Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026476›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2016

Gastroschisis: epidemiology and mode of delivery, 2005-2013.

Alexander M Friedman, Cande V Ananth, Zainab Siddiq, Mary E D'Alton, Jason D Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abdominal Wall Defects-Current Treatments.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Sutureless closure for the management of gastroschisis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander M FriedmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: amf2104@cumc.columbia.edu.
Cande V AnanthDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Zainab SiddiqDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Mary E D'AltonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Jason D WrightDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Funding

Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development AwardK08HD082287 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, ALEXANDER M · 2015 to 2018
$593k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD082287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastroschisis is a severe congenital anomaly the etiology of which is unknown. Research evidence supports attempted vaginal delivery for pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis in the absence of obstetric indications for cesarean delivery.

objectiveThe objectives of the study evaluating pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis were to determine the proportion of women undergoing planned cesarean vs attempted vaginal delivery and to provide up-to-date epidemiology on the risk factors associated with this anomaly. STUDY

designThis population-based study of US natality records from 2005 through 2013 evaluated pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis. Women were classified based on whether they attempted vaginal delivery or underwent a planned cesarean (n = 24,836,777). Obstetrical, medical, and demographic characteristics were evaluated. Multivariable log-linear regression models were developed to determine the factors associated with the mode of delivery. Factors associated with the occurrence of the anomaly were also evaluated in log-linear models.

resultsOf 5985 pregnancies with gastroschisis, 63.5% (n = 3800) attempted vaginal delivery and 36.5% (n = 2185) underwent a planned cesarean delivery. The rate of attempted vaginal delivery increased from 59.7% in 2005 to 68.8% in 2013. Earlier gestational age and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with lower rates of attempted vaginal delivery. Factors associated with the occurrence of gastroschisis included young age, smoking, high educational attainment, and being married. Protective factors included chronic hypertension, black race, and obesity. The incidence of gastroschisis was 3.1 per 10,000 pregnancies and did not increase during the study period.

conclusionAttempted vaginal delivery is becoming increasingly prevalent for women with a pregnancy complicated by gastroschisis. Recommendations from the research literature findings may be diffusing into clinical practice. A significant proportion of women with this anomaly still deliver by planned cesarean, suggesting further reduction of surgical delivery for this anomaly is possible.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleAdultBody Mass IndexCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricEducational StatusFemaleGastroschisisGestational AgeHumansIntracranial Hemorrhage, HypertensiveMarital StatusMaternal AgeObesityPregnancyPremature Birthcesarean deliverycongenital anomalygastroschisispregnancyvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID27026476
PMCPMC5003749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.