Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026073›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2016

Immune responses to endogenous retroelements: taking the bad with the good.

George Kassiotis, Jonathan P Stoye

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George KassiotisRetroviral Immunology, the Francis Crick Institute, Mill Hill Laboratory, London NW7 1AA, UK.
Jonathan P StoyeDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_U117512710Wellcome Trust 102898/B/13/ZWellcome Trust 108012/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ultimate form of parasitism and evasion of host immunity is for the parasite genome to enter the germ line of the host species. Retroviruses have invaded the host germ line on the grandest scale, and this is evident in the extraordinary abundance of endogenous retroelements in the genome of all vertebrate species that have been studied. Many of these endogenous retroelements have retained viral characteristics; some also the capacity to replicate and, consequently, the potential to trigger host innate and adaptive immune responses. However, although retroelements are mainly recognized for their pathogenic potential, recent evidence suggests that this 'enemy within' may also have beneficial roles in tuning host immune reactivity. In this Review, we discuss how the immune system recognizes and is shaped by endogenous retroelements.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityB-LymphocytesEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunity, InnateRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesToll-Like ReceptorsRetroelementsToll-Like Receptors

Identifiers

PMID27026073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.