Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026035›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2016

Autonomic Testing in Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Gisela Chelimsky, Pippa Simpson, Noel McCabe, Liyun Zhang, Thomas Chelimsky, collaborative

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deep venous stenting in females.CVIR endovascular · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Vulvodynia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gisela ChelimskyMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Case Western Reserve University (NM), Cleveland, Ohio.
Pippa SimpsonMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Case Western Reserve University (NM), Cleveland, Ohio.
Noel McCabeMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Case Western Reserve University (NM), Cleveland, Ohio.
Liyun ZhangMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Case Western Reserve University (NM), Cleveland, Ohio.
Thomas ChelimskyMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Case Western Reserve University (NM), Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: tchelimsky@mcw.edu.
collaborative
Case Western Reserve University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Neurophysiologic & Autonomic Characterization of Interstitial Cystitis/Painful BlR01DK083538 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HELMS, ANN K · 2009 to 2020
$6.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe determined whether abnormal autonomic nervous system innervation of the bladder underlies IC (interstitial cystitis)/BPS (bladder pain syndrome) differently than other chronic pelvic pain. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this institutional review board approved protocol 39 healthy controls and 134 subjects were enrolled, including 36 with IC/BPS, 14 with myofascial pelvic pain and 42 with IC/BPS plus myofascial pelvic pain. Three subjects were excluded from study. Autonomic nervous system evaluations included deep breathing, the Valsalva maneuver, and the tilt table and sudomotor tests. The latter evaluates autonomic neuropathy. A modified validated composite autonomic laboratory score was applied.

resultsMedian age in the IC/BPS group was 47.5 years (range 21 to 78), greater than in healthy controls (34 years, range 20 to 75, p = 0.006), the myofascial pelvic pain group (33 years, range 22 to 56, p = 0.004) and the IC/BPS plus myofascial pelvic pain group (38 years, range 18 to 64, p = 0.03). Body mass index did not significantly differ but the myofascial pelvic pain and IC/BPS plus myofascial pelvic pain groups had a higher body mass index than healthy controls (p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively). Cardiovascular and adrenergic indexes did not differ. The tilt table test showed more orthostatic intolerance in all chronic pelvic pain groups. Tilt table test diagnoses (orthostatic hypotension, postural tachycardia syndrome and reflex syncope) were rare. Baseline heart rate was higher in all chronic pelvic pain groups (p = 0.004). Compared to healthy controls all myofascial pelvic pain groups showed significantly more clear-cut autonomic neuropathy, defined as a sweat score of 3 or greater (vs IC/BPS plus myofascial pelvic pain p = 0.007 and vs myofascial pelvic pain p = 0.03).

conclusionsSome chronic pelvic pain types show autonomic neuropathy and some show vagal withdrawal. In all types orthostatic intolerance likely reflects central sensitization and perhaps catastrophizing. Some of these findings suggest novel therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAutonomic Nervous SystemCase-Control StudiesChronic PainCystitis, InterstitialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationPelvic PainProspective StudiesYoung Adultautonomic nervous systemchronic paincystitis, interstitialpelvic painurinary bladder

Identifiers

PMID27026035
PMCPMC4969223
OpenAlexW2305031442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.