Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27026012›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Effects of indexes of consciousness (IoC1 and IoC2) monitoring on remifentanil dosage in modified radical mastectomy: a randomized trial.

Guisheng Wu, Lei Zhang, Xuxiang Wang, Ailan Yu, Zongwang Zhang, Jingui Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Am I Sedated or in Pain? Please Monitor by Brain.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guisheng WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Xuxiang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Ailan YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Zongwang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252000, China.
Jingui YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China. yujingui1109@126.com.
Liaocheng People's Hospital · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the effects of indexes of consciousness (IoC1 and IoC2) monitoring on remifentanil dosage.

methodsIn this randomized, single-blinded, prospective study, 120 patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy were randomly assigned to the treatment group (T group, n = 60) or control group (C group, n = 60). In the T group, patients received both IoC1 (sedation) and IoC2 (analgesia) monitoring, and remifentanil dosages were adjusted by anesthetists according to IoC2. In the C group, remifentanil dosages were adjusted based on the anesthetists' judgment according to the patients' vital signs. Remifentanil dose, adjustment frequency, infusion duration, intraoperative adverse events, and quality of anesthetic recovery were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the dose of remifentanil.

resultsCompared with the C group, mean remifentanil dosage was significantly higher in the T group (3.8 ± 1.9 versus 3.2 ± 1.2 μg kg(-1) h(-1), P < 0.05) during the anesthetic period, as was the adjustment frequency of target-controlled infusion (2.9 ± 1.9 versus 2.0 ± 1.2 times/surgery, P < 0.05), but there was no difference in infusion duration. Voluntary eye opening, extubation time, and recovery score were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Total adverse events were significantly reduced in the T group (P < 0.05).

conclusionsIoC1-targeted propofol dosing does not seem to be significantly different to hemodynamic-based monitoring, whereas IoC2 monitoring can increase remifentanil dosage during modified radical mastectomy, but the anesthetic process is more controllable and total adverse events are reduced, which improves the controllability of anesthesia.

trial registrationTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-TRC-13004101 , registered on 27 November 2013.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, Modified RadicalAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBlood PressureChinaConsciousnessFemaleHeart RateHumansMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativePiperidinesPostoperative PainPropofolProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionAnalgesics, OpioidPiperidinesPropofolRemifentanilIndex of consciousnessIoC2 monitoringPropofolRemifentanilUnilateral modified radical mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID27026012
PMCPMC4810508
OpenAlexW2333886711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.