Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025903›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of clinical oncology2016

Randomized Phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1113, FUGA-BT).

Junki Mizusawa, Chigusa Morizane, Takuji Okusaka, Hiroshi Katayama, Hiroshi Ishii, Haruhiko Fukuda, Junji Furuse, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2020
    Review
  16. Therapy of Primary Liver Cancer.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnostic-therapeutic management of bile duct cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junki MizusawaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo.
Chigusa MorizaneHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo cmorizan@ncc.go.jp.
Takuji OkusakaHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo.
Hiroshi KatayamaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo.
Hiroshi IshiiClinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime.
Haruhiko FukudaJCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo.
Junji FuruseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group
Kyorin University · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Phase II selection design trial was conducted to identify the most promising regimen for comparison with standard therapy in chemo-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (JCOG0805). Gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy showed better efficacy than S-1 monotherapy with acceptable safety in JCOG0805 study. Based on this result, a randomized Phase III trial was started in May 2013 to confirm the non-inferiority of gemcitabine plus S-1 therapy relative to gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy, which is the current standard treatment for chemo-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer. A total of 350 patients will be accrued from 32 Japanese institutions within 4 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival, while the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, adverse events, serious adverse events, clinically significant adverse events, response rate and %planned dose. This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm) and the registration number is UMIN000010667.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsCisplatinDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDrug CombinationsFemaleGemcitabineHumansJapanMaleOxonic AcidPatient SelectionTegafurTreatment OutcomeCisplatinDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsGemcitabineOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafurchemo-naive unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancercisplatingemcitabinePhase IIIS-1

Identifiers

PMID27025903
PMCPMC4886137
OpenAlexW2321683347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.