ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2016
An Impedance-Based Model for the Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Function in Rabbits.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving the quality of physiologic data collected from research animals is most easily accomplished by collecting as much information as possible from a single subject, thereby reducing animal use and error associated with satellite groups. We investigated the feasibility of using a large-animal implantable telemetry device in New Zealand white rabbits (n = 6). The first task was to develop an implantation technique that yielded calibrated tidal volume (Vt) measurements that were within 10% of those obtained simultaneously from a pneumotachograph, a low-noise electrocardiogram, and stable blood pressure. The second task was to challenge implanted rabbits with the respiratory stimulant doxapram to assess linearity of the calibration across a range of Vt. Of the 3 electrode placements attempted, only one resulted in calibrations consistently below 10% error. Optimal electrode placement resulted in calibrated Vt measurements within 1.7% ± 0.3% of those obtained from a pneumotachograph during normal tidal breathing, 7.3% ± 0.7% of those after saline injection, and 6.0% ± 0.5% of those after doxapram injection. The Vt range was 9 to 15 mL for normal tidal breathing and saline injection and 25 to 30 mL after doxapram injection. Increases in mean arterial pressure of 25.0 ± 6.82 mm Hg and decreases in heart rate of 56.3 ± 6.82 bpm were associated with doxapram injection only. Our findings represent the first time that multiple cardiopulmonary endpoints have been assessed by telemetry in conscious, restrained rabbits. Whether animal position affects calibration accuracy warrants investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27025814PMC4783641W2321970608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.