Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025612›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2014

The Role of Antifungals against Candida Biofilm in Catheter-Related Candidemia.

Emilio Bouza, Jesús Guinea, María Guembe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biofilm formation and drug susceptibility of biofilmIranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Amphotericin B in the Era of New Antifungals: Where Will It Stand?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Antifungal therapy ofBiofilm · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Contribution ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Polymicrobial Biofilm Dynamics of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Eradication ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilio BouzaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid 28007, Spain. ebouza@microb.net.
Jesús GuineaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid 28007, Spain. jguineaortega@yahoo.es.
María GuembeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid 28007, Spain. mariaguembe@hotmail.com.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI) is one of the most frequent nosocomial infections. It is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Candida spp. is the third most common cause of C-RBSI after coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus and is responsible for approximately 8% of episodes. The main cause of catheter-related candidemia is the ability of some Candida strains-mainly C. albicans and C. parapsilosis-to produce biofilms. Many in vitro and in vivo models have been designed to assess the activity of antifungal drugs against Candida biofilms. Echinocandins have proven to be the most active antifungal drugs. Potential options in situations where the catheter cannot be removed include the combination of systemic and lock antifungal therapy. However, well-designed and -executed clinical trials must be performed before firm recommendations can be issued.

Indexed as

antifungalsbiofilmCandidacatheter-related candidemia

Identifiers

PMID27025612
PMCPMC4790322
OpenAlexW2017633020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.