Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025606›Full record

ArticleRadiation and environmental biophysics2016

Bystander effects and compartmental stress response to X-ray irradiation in L929 cells.

Mihaela Temelie, Daniela Stroe, Ileana Petcu, Cosmin Mustaciosu, Nicoleta Moisoi, Diana Savu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mihaela TemelieHoria Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH, 30 Reactorului St., P.O. BOX MG-6, Magurele, Bucharest, Romania.
Daniela StroeThe Oncologic Radiotherapy Clinic, The Coltea Bucharest Hospital, No. 1-3, I. C. Bratianu Boulevard, District 3, Bucharest, Romania.
Ileana PetcuHoria Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH, 30 Reactorului St., P.O. BOX MG-6, Magurele, Bucharest, Romania.
Cosmin MustaciosuHoria Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH, 30 Reactorului St., P.O. BOX MG-6, Magurele, Bucharest, Romania.
Nicoleta MoisoiNeuroscience Psychology and Behaviour Department, University of Leicester, Maurice Shock Building, University Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
Diana SavuHoria Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH, 30 Reactorului St., P.O. BOX MG-6, Magurele, Bucharest, Romania. dsavu@nipne.ro.ORCID 0000-0002-0145-5176
Horia Hulubei National Institute for R and D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bystander effects are indirect consequences of radiation and many other stress factors. They occur in cells that are not directly exposed to these factors, but receive signals from affected cells either by gap junctions or by molecules released in the medium. Characterizing these effects and deciphering the underlying mechanisms involved in radiation-induced bystander effects are relevant for cancer radiotherapy and radioprotection. At doses of X-ray radiation 0.5 and 1 Gy, we detected bystander effects as increased numbers of micronuclei shortly after the treatment, through medium transfer and by co-cultures. Interestingly, bystander cells did not exhibit long-term adverse changes in viability. Evaluation of several compartmental stress markers (CHOP, BiP, mtHsp60, cytHsp70) by qRT-PCR did not reveal expression changes at transcriptional level. We investigated the involvement of ROS and NO in this process by addition of specific scavengers of these molecules, DMSO or c-PTIO in the transferred medium. This approach proved that ROS but not NO is involved in the induction of lesions in the acceptor cells. These results indicate that L929 cells are susceptible to stress effects of radiation-induced bystander signaling.

Indexed as

Bystander EffectMicronuclei, Chromosome-DefectiveX-RaysAnimalsCell LineCell SurvivalChaperonin 60Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMiceMitochondrial ProteinsNitric OxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesStress, PhysiologicalTranscription Factor CHOPChaperonin 60Ddit3 protein, mouseEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHspd1 protein, mouseMitochondrial ProteinsNitric OxideReactive Oxygen SpeciesTranscription Factor CHOPBystander effectCompartmental stress responseDNA damageX-rays

Identifiers

PMID27025606
OpenAlexW2323747327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.