ReviewBMC medical informatics and decision making2016
Rethinking the role and impact of health information technology: informatics as an interventional discipline.
Review in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel factors influence the use of a cardiovascular disease assessment tool embedded in the electronic health record in oncology care.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Social Marketing Perspective on Participant Recruitment in Informatics-Based Intervention Studies.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
- Evidence Enlightens Electronic Health Record Modernization.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Operational Implementation of Remote Patient Monitoring Within a Large Ambulatory Health System: Multimethod Qualitative Case Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- New Approach to Privacy-Preserving Clinical Decision Support Systems for HIV Treatment.Journal of medical systems · 2022Article
- Better together: Integrating biomedical informatics and healthcare IT operations to create a learning health system during the COVID-19 pandemic.Learning health systems · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular informatics: building a bridge to data harmony.Cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Health Information Technology use among healthcare providers treating children and adolescents with obesity: A systematic review.Current epidemiology reports · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular Assessment Tool for Breast Cancer Survivors and Oncology Providers: Usability Study.JMIR cancer · 2021Article
- Development of a Health Information Technology Tool for Behavior Change to Address Obesity and Prevent Chronic Disease Among Adolescents: Designing for Dissemination and Sustainment Using the ORBIT Model.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Cloud-Based System for Effective Surveillance and Control of COVID-19: Useful Experiences From Hubei, China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- The challenges of emerging HISs in bridging the communication gaps among physicians and nurses in China: an interview study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in the adoption and use of health information technology (HIT) have had a dramatic impact on the practice of medicine. In many environments, this has led to the ability to achieve new efficiencies and levels of safety. In others, the impact has been less positive, and is associated with both: 1) workflow and user experience dissatisfaction; and 2) perceptions of missed opportunities relative to the use of computational tools to enable data-driven and precise clinical decision making. Simultaneously, the "pipeline" through which new diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents are being developed and brought to the point-of-care or population health is challenged in terms of both cost and timeliness. Given the confluence of these trends, it can be argued that now is the time to consider new ways in which HIT can be used to deliver health and wellness interventions comparable to traditional approaches (e.g., drugs, devices, diagnostics, and behavioral modifications). Doing so could serve to fulfill the promise of what has been recently promoted as "precision medicine" in a rapid and cost-effective manner. However, it will also require the health and life sciences community to embrace new modes of using HIT, wherein the use of technology becomes a primary intervention as opposed to enabler of more conventional approaches, a model that we refer to in this commentary as "interventional informatics". Such a paradigm requires attention to critical issues, including: 1) the nature of the relationships between HIT vendors and healthcare innovators; 2) the formation and function of multidisciplinary teams consisting of technologists, informaticians, and clinical or scientific subject matter experts; and 3) the optimal design and execution of clinical studies that focus on HIT as the intervention of interest. Ultimately, the goal of an "interventional informatics" approach can and should be to substantially improve human health and wellness through the use of data-driven interventions at the point of care of broader population levels. Achieving a vision of "interventional informatics" will requires us to re-think how we study HIT tools in order to generate the necessary evidence-base that can support and justify their use as a primary means of improving the human condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.