Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025571›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Sleeping Beauty transposase structure allows rational design of hyperactive variants for genetic engineering.

Franka Voigt, Lisa Wiedemann, Cecilia Zuliani, Irma Querques, Attila Sebe, Lajos Mátés, Zsuzsanna Izsvák, Zoltán Ivics, Orsolya Barabas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Programming T cells for intercellular genome editing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Recent advances in therapeutic gene-editing technologies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A novel hyperactive variant of theMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024
    Article
  8. Targeted gene delivery systems for T-cell engineering.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  9. Precise Gene Knock-In Tools with Minimized Risk of DSBs: A Trend for Gene Manipulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Jumping Ahead withViruses · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franka VoigtEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Lisa WiedemannPaul Ehrlich Institute, Division of Medical Biotechnology, Paul Ehrlich Strasse 51-59, Langen 63225, Germany.
Cecilia ZulianiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Irma QuerquesEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Attila SebePaul Ehrlich Institute, Division of Medical Biotechnology, Paul Ehrlich Strasse 51-59, Langen 63225, Germany.
Lajos MátésMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Rössle Strasse 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Zsuzsanna IzsvákMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Rössle Strasse 10, Berlin 13092, Germany.
Zoltán IvicsPaul Ehrlich Institute, Division of Medical Biotechnology, Paul Ehrlich Strasse 51-59, Langen 63225, Germany.
Orsolya BarabasEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural and Computational Biology Unit, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

European Research Council 294742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleeping Beauty (SB) is a prominent Tc1/mariner superfamily DNA transposon that provides a popular genome engineering tool in a broad range of organisms. It is mobilized by a transposase enzyme that catalyses DNA cleavage and integration at short specific sequences at the transposon ends. To facilitate SB's applications, here we determine the crystal structure of the transposase catalytic domain and use it to model the SB transposase/transposon end/target DNA complex. Together with biochemical and cell-based transposition assays, our structure reveals mechanistic insights into SB transposition and rationalizes previous hyperactive transposase mutations. Moreover, our data enables us to design two additional hyperactive transposase variants. Our work provides a useful resource and proof-of-concept for structure-based engineering of tailored SB transposases.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDNA Transposable ElementsModels, MolecularMutagenesisMutationTransposasesDNA Transposable ElementsTransposases

Identifiers

PMID27025571
PMCPMC4820933
OpenAlexW2320796484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.