Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025508›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2016

Central nervous system prophylaxis with intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in a subset of high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving first line systemic therapy in a prospective trial.

E González-Barca, M Canales, A Salar, J J Ferreiro-Martínez, S Ferrer-Bordes, J A García-Marco, J J Sánchez-Blanco, J García-Frade, J Peñalver, J L Bello-López and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

E González-BarcaInstitut Català d'Oncologia. IDIBELL., Hospital Duran i Reynals, Av. Gran Vía 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. e.gonzalez@iconcologia.net.
M CanalesHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
A SalarHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
J J Ferreiro-MartínezHospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain.
S Ferrer-BordesHospital Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain.
J A García-MarcoHospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
J J Sánchez-BlancoHospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
J García-FradeHospital Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
J PeñalverFundación Hospital de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
J L Bello-LópezComplexo Hospitalario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J M SanchoInstitut Català d'Oncologia - Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
D CaballeroHospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
GELTAMO group
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissemination in the central nervous system (CNS) is an uncommon but fatal complication occurring in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Standard prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce CNS relapse and improve survival rates. Intrathecal (IT) liposomal cytarabine allows maintaining elevated drug levels in the cerebrospinal fluid for an extended period of time. Data on the efficacy and safety of liposomal cytarabine as CNS prophylaxis in patients with DLBCL are still insufficient. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the prophylaxis with IT liposomal cytarabine in prevention of CNS relapse in high-risk patients with DLBCL who were included in a trial of first line systemic therapy with 6 cycles of dose-dense R-CHOP every 14 days. Twenty-four (18.6 %) out of 129 patients were identified to have risk factors for CNS involvement, defined as follows: >30 % bone marrow infiltration, testes infiltration, retroperitoneal mass ≥10 cm, Waldeyer ring, or bulky cervical nodes involvement. Liposomal cytarabine (50 mg) was administered by lumbar puncture the first day of the 1st, 2nd, and 6th cycle of R-CHOP14 scheme. Among 70 IT infusions, grade 3-4 adverse events reported were headache (one patient) and nausea/vomiting (one patient). With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, no CNS involvement by DLBCL was observed in any patient. In conclusion, IT liposomal cytarabine is safe, feasible, and effective for CNS prophylaxis, causing few associated risks and little discomfort to patients with DLBCL.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideCytarabineDoxorubicinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, SpinalLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCyclophosphamideCytarabineDoxorubicinPrednisoneR-CHOP protocolRituximabVincristineCentral nervous systemDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLiposomal cytarabineProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID27025508
PMCPMC4853453
OpenAlexW2318765870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.