Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025505›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology reports2016

The Independent Effects of Strength Training in Cancer Survivors: a Systematic Review.

Erik D Hanson, Chad W Wagoner, Travis Anderson, Claudio L Battaglini

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Resistance training for fatigue in people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Community-based exercise programs and cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Cancer survivors' interests and preferences for muscle-strengthening activity interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A nationally representative study of aerobic activity and strength training in older cancer survivors and their psychological distress and sleep difficulties.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Targeting cancer via ribosome biogenesis: the cachexia perspective.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik D HansonIntegrative Exercise Oncology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #8700, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. edhanson@email.unc.edu.
Chad W WagonerIntegrative Exercise Oncology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #8700, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Travis AndersonIntegrative Exercise Oncology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #8700, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Claudio L BattagliniIntegrative Exercise Oncology Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #8700, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatment is associated with adverse changes in strength, body composition, physical function, and quality of life. Exercise training reduces cancer incidence and mortality rates and may offset some of the treatment-related effects. To determine the independent effects of strength training (ST) on the effects of cancer treatment, an initial search was performed in March and then updated in November 2015. Additional articles were identified by scanning references from relevant articles. Studies using traditional ST on strength, body composition, aerobic capacity, functional assessments, and psychosocial parameters were included. Excluded studies had no objective strength measurement or combined ST with additional exercise. Mean and standard deviations from 39 studies across seven cancer types were extracted for main outcomes. ST-induced change scores with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and were evaluated with paired t tests, where appropriate. Twenty to fifty percent improvements in maximal strength were observed, indicating that the ST programs were effective. Physical function was also enhanced (7-38%), although gains were less consistent. Body composition and psychosocial changes were rare, with only a few changes in selected cancer types. As such, ST appears to promote benefits that may be specific to cancer types. Strength was the only consistent outcome that improved in all cancer survivors. However, these gains in strength are still of tremendous importance, given its impact on functionality and quality of life. Several practical considerations for exercise testing, training, and data reporting are presented for consideration to improve the overall depth of the field.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurvivorsAnxietyBody CompositionBody ImageDepressionHand StrengthHumansNeoplasmsResistance TrainingBody compositionCancerExerciseQuality of lifeResistance trainingStrength

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.