ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2016
CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: assessment of coronary artery disease severity and complexity and comparison to other scoring systems in the prediction of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting complications in emergency department patients with acute coronary syndrome - Existing risk scores versus a new logistic regression model.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Coronary artery disease severity and risk stratification of patients with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome using CHABMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of CHATurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2023Article
- Cardiac scoring systems, coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiovascular events: A scoping review.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023Article
- Atherosclerotic Burden is the Highway to Cardiovascular Events.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Predictive value of CHADSBMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Association of GRACE Risk Score with Coronary Artery Disease Complexity in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Understanding Vascular Age: Are Clinical scoring systems useful for Early Vascular Aging Syndrome Prediction ?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2020Observational
- Utilization of NaF-PET/CT in assessing global cardiovascular calcification using CHADSAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- The Relationship Between Mitral Annular Calcification, Metabolic Syndrome and Thromboembolic Risk.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2019Article
- CHA2DS2-VASC Score Predicts Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Application of Risks Scores in Acute Coronary Syndromes. How Does ProACS Hold Up Against Other Risks Scores?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Article
- CHAThe Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- Predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc and CHA2DS2-VASc-HS scores for failed reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Cardiology journal · 2019Article
- Usefulness of the CHADSClinical interventions in aging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe recently described the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score as a novel predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity in stable CAD patients. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in the determination of CAD severity and complexity and its availability in the risk stratification of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients.
methodsWe prospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographic data of consecutive NSTE-ACS patients in our clinic. Patients were classified into three tertiles according to their SYNTAX score (SS): tertile 1 had an SS of 0-22; tertile 2 had an SS of 23-32; and tertile 3 had an SS of >32. There were no specific exclusion criteria except for previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because SS was validated for only native coronary arteries for this study. We used the following analyses: χ2 or Fisher's exact tests, one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests, Pearson's or Spearman's tests, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) or C-statistic, and pairwise comparisons of the ROC curves.
resultsA total of 252 patients were enrolled. There were 131 patients in tertile 1, 79 in tertile 2, and 42 in tertile 3. The number of diseased vessels was correlated with the Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) (p<0.001), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) (p<0.001), and CHA2DS2-VASc-HS (p<0.001) scores. In the ROC curve analyses, the cut-off value of the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score in the prediction of in-hospital MACE was >5 with a sensitivity of 69.6% and specificity of 90.3% (AUC: 0.804, 95%: CI 0.750-0.851, p<0.001). We also compared the diagnostic accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score with the TIMI and GRACE risk scores in the determination of the in-hospital MACE and found no differences.
conclusionThe CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score was positively correlated with the severity and complexity of CAD. We also found that CHA2DS2-VASc-HS was comparable with other risk scores for the risk stratification of the in-hospital MACE of NSTE-ACS patients. Therefore, it may play an important role as a predictive model of NSTE-ACS patients in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.