Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27025169›Full record

ArticleHeredity2016

Conservation priorities of Iberoamerican pig breeds and their ancestors based on microsatellite information.

O Cortés, A M Martinez, J Cañon, N Sevane, L T Gama, C Ginja, V Landi, P Zaragoza, N Carolino, A Vicente and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

O CortésDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Madrid, Spain.
A M MartinezDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
J CañonDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Madrid, Spain.
N SevaneDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Madrid, Spain.
L T GamaCIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
C GinjaCe3C-Centro de Ecologia, Evolução e Alterações Ambientais, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2278-7089
V LandiDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
P ZaragozaLaboratorio de Genética Bioquímica, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
N CarolinoInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. Unidade Estratégica de Investigação e Serviços de Biotecnologia e Recursos Genéticos Polo de Investigação da Fonte Boa, Vale de Santarém, Portugal.
A VicenteInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P. Unidade Estratégica de Investigação e Serviços de Biotecnologia e Recursos Genéticos Polo de Investigação da Fonte Boa, Vale de Santarém, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-5509
P SponenbergRegional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
J V DelgadoDepartamento de Genética, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Criollo pig breeds are descendants from pigs brought to the American continent starting with Columbus second trip in 1493. Pigs currently play a key role in social economy and community cultural identity in Latin America. The aim of this study was to establish conservation priorities among a comprehensive group of Criollo pig breeds based on a set of 24 microsatellite markers and using different criteria. Spain and Portugal pig breeds, wild boar populations of different European geographic origins and commercial pig breeds were included in the analysis as potential genetic influences in the development of Criollo pig breeds. Different methods, differing in the weight given to within- and between-breed genetic variability, were used in order to estimate the contribution of each breed to global genetic diversity. As expected, the partial contribution to total heterozygosity gave high priority to Criollo pig breeds, whereas Weitzman procedures prioritized Iberian Peninsula breeds. With the combined within- and between-breed approaches, different conservation priorities were achieved. The Core Set methodologies highly prioritized Criollo pig breeds (Cr. Boliviano, Cr. Pacifico, Cr. Cubano and Cr. Guadalupe). However, weighing the between- and within-breed components with FST and 1-FST, respectively, resulted in higher contributions of Iberian breeds. In spite of the different conservation priorities according to the methodology used, other factors in addition to genetic information also need to be considered in conservation programmes, such as the economic, cultural or historical value of the breeds involved.

Indexed as

BreedingMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenotypeSwine

Identifiers

PMID27025169
PMCPMC4901353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.