ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016
Patterns and Economic Burden of Hospitalizations and Exacerbations Among Patients Diagnosed with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic burden and cost drivers of interstitial lung disease: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Pooled it
- Economic Burden of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Updated Evidence on Costs and Resource Use.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review on the economic burden of interstitial lung disease and the cost-effectiveness of current therapies.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life in IPF Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2019Pooled it
- The Burden of Illness of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Comprehensive Evidence Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2018Pooled it
- Acute exacerbation in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: an international working group report.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Health care utilization and costs associated with acute exacerbation of fibrosing interstitial lung disease in the United States: A retrospective administrative claims database analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Hospitalisations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: insights from the IPF-PRO Registry and EMPIRE Registry.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Smoking status and clinical outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a nationwide study.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Impact of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease on healthcare use: association between fvc decline and inpatient hospitalization.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Drug therapies for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Re-hospitalisation predicts poor prognosis after acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Epidemiology, healthcare utilization, and related costs among patients with IPF: results from a German claims database analysis.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- Cost-effectiveness of the anti-fibrotics for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the United States.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Physician and patient perspectives on the pathway to care from symptom recognition to diagnosis and disease burden.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2022Article
- Bias and Reporting Quality of Clinical Prognostic Models for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Review
- Hospitalizations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2021Observational
- Global incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2021Review
- Cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Critical appraisal of the quality of clinical practice guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare and fatal restrictive respiratory disease under the idiopathic lung disease (ILD) class. IPF is a form of chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia and has more scarring, less inflammation, and poorer prognosis than most other ILD forms. Exacerbation of IPF is rapid, with unpredictable deterioration of lung function, and is associated with short-term mortality. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management of IPF reports that the incidence of acute exacerbations is between 5%-10%. Limited real-world evidence has been identified in the United States that assesses patterns of hospitalization, exacerbation of IPF, and the associated economic burden.
objectivesTo (a) characterize patients newly diagnosed with IPF and (b) examine incidence rates and costs of all-cause hospitalizations, IPF-related hospitalizations, and exacerbations.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed with a national commercial claims database from calendar years 2006 to 2011. Newly diagnosed IPF patients were identified with either ≥ 2 claims for idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis (IFA) or ≥ 1 claim for IFA and ≥ 1 claim for postinflammatory pulmonary fibrosis and a lung biopsy or thoracic high-resolution computed tomography within 90 days of the first claim for IFA (index date). IPF-related hospitalizations and possible IPF exacerbations were defined based on diagnoses recorded on event claims. Frequency, incidence rate, duration of events, and associated costs from the third-party payer's perspective were estimated.
resultsAmong 1,735 identified IPF patients, 38.6% had at least 1 all-cause hospitalization; 10.8% had IPF-related hospitalizations; 4.6% had suspected IPF exacerbations leading to hospitalization; and 72.1% had suspected IPF exacerbations leading to urgent outpatient visits during the 1-year post-index period. Incident rates for these 4 events were 83 (95% CI = 79-88), 17 (95% CI = 14-19), 7 (95% CI = 6-9), and 277 (95% CI = 269-286) per 100 person-years, respectively. Average costs per event were $13,987 (SD = $41,988), $16,812 (SD = $66,399), $14,731 (SD = $85,468), and $444 (SD = $1,481), respectively.
conclusionsHospitalizations and possible exacerbations among patients with IPF were costly. Appropriate management of IPF needs to be considered to help slow IPF disease progression. DISCLOSURES: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI) provided funding for this study. Yu and Devercelli are currently salaried employees of BIPI. Wu, Chuang, Wang, Pan, and Benjamin are currently employees of Evidera, which provides consulting and other research services to pharmaceutical, device, government, and nongovernment organizations. In their salaried positions, they work with a variety of companies and organizations and are precluded from receiving payment or honoraria directly from these organizations for services rendered. Evidera received funding from BIPI to conduct the analysis. Coultas was previously a paid consultant of BIPI. The contents do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government. This manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data. The authors have full control of all primary data, and they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested. All authors meet the criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, and they are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions and were involved at all stages of manuscript development. The manuscript was drafted by Benjamin, Wu, and Yu and revised by Wang, Pan, Yu, Coultas, and Devercelli. The study was designed by Yu, Wu, Chuang, Wang, Benjamin, and Coultas. Statistical analysis was conducted by Wu, Chuang, and Wang. Senior review was provided by Coultas and Devercelli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.