Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27023601›Full record

ReviewToxins2016

Use of Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Disorders: A Review of the Literature.

David C Moore, Joshua A Cohn, Roger R Dmochowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurogenic Bladder in Children with Myelomeningocele.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Botulinum Toxin Use in Neurourology.Reviews in urology · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C MooreDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2765, USA. david.c.moore@vanderbilt.edu.
Joshua A CohnDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2765, USA. joshua.cohn@vanderbilt.edu.
Roger R DmochowskiDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2765, USA. roger.dmochowski@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is used to treat a variety of ailments, and its therapeutic application in lower urinary tract disorders (LUTDs) is well studied. Robust evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of BoNT in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) has led to regulatory approval for these conditions. Use of BoNT in the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, chronic pelvic pain, and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia has demonstrated some promise, but is still evolving and off-label for these indications. Trials to date do not support the use of BoNT for benign prostatic hyperplasia. This comprehensive review outlines the mechanisms of BoNT in the treatment of LUTDs in adults and presents background and updated data examining the efficacy and adverse events associated with the use of BoNT in common urologic applications.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AHumansMalePelvic PainProstatic HyperplasiaUrinary Bladder DiseasesBotulinum Toxins, Type Abenign prostatic hyperplasiabotulinum toxindetrusor sphincter dyssynergiainterstitial cystitisneurogenic bladderoveractive bladder

Identifiers

PMID27023601
PMCPMC4848615
OpenAlexW2305654015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.