Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27023288›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Conservation Research Is Not Happening Where It Is Most Needed.

Kerrie A Wilson, Nancy A Auerbach, Katerina Sam, Ariana G Magini, Alexander St L Moss, Simone D Langhans, Sugeng Budiharta, Dilva Terzano, Erik Meijaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of conservation interventions to promote voluntary behavior change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Joining forces toward proactive elephant and rhinoceros conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Language barriers in conservation science citation networks.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The scope of empowerment for conservation and communities.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Social Perception of Zoos and Aquariums: What We Know and How We Know It.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Growth of non-English-language literature on biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kerrie A WilsonSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nancy A AuerbachSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Katerina SamInstitute of Entomology, Biology Centre CAS, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Ariana G MaginiSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alexander St L MossKPMG Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Simone D LanghansLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany.
Sugeng BudihartaSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Dilva TerzanoSchool of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Erik MeijaardSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target 19, set by the Convention on Biological Diversity, seeks to improve the knowledge, science base, and technologies relating to biodiversity. We will fail to achieve this target unless prolific biases in the field of conservation science are addressed. We reveal that comparatively less research is undertaken in the world's most biodiverse countries, the science conducted in these countries is often not led by researchers based in-country, and these scientists are also underrepresented in important international fora. Mitigating these biases requires wide-ranging solutions: reforming open access publishing policies, enhancing science communication strategies, changing author attribution practices, improving representation in international processes, and strengthening infrastructure and human capacity for research in countries where it is most needed.

Indexed as

Conservation of Energy ResourcesBiodiversityResearch

Identifiers

PMID27023288
PMCPMC4811576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.