Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27023275›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions.

Mohameedyaseen Syedbasha, Janina Linnik, Deanna Santer, Daire O'Shea, Khaled Barakat, Michael Joyce, Nina Khanna, D Lorne Tyrrell, Michael Houghton, Adrian Egli

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identifying Function Determining Residues in Neuroimmune Semaphorin 4A.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Bioassay Development for Bispecific Antibodies-Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohameedyaseen SyedbashaApplied Microbiology Research, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel.
Janina LinnikApplied Microbiology Research, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel; Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics.
Deanna SanterLi Ka Shing Institute for Virology, University of Alberta.
Daire O'SheaRegional Infectious Diseases Unit, University of Edinburgh.
Khaled BarakatLi Ka Shing Institute for Virology, University of Alberta; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta.
Michael JoyceLi Ka Shing Institute for Virology, University of Alberta.
Nina KhannaInfection Biology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel.
D Lorne TyrrellLi Ka Shing Institute for Virology, University of Alberta.
Michael HoughtonLi Ka Shing Institute for Virology, University of Alberta.
Adrian EgliApplied Microbiology Research, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel; Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Basel; adrian.egli@usb.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of signaling pathways requires detailed knowledge regarding ligand-receptor interaction. This article describes two fast and reliable point-by-point protocols of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the investigation of ligand-receptor interactions: the direct ligand-receptor interaction assay (LRA) and the competition LRA. As a case study, the ELISA based analysis of the interaction between different lambda interferons (IFNLs) and the alpha subunit of their receptor (IL28RA) is presented: the direct LRA is used for the determination of dissociation constants (KD values) between receptor and IFN ligands, and the competition LRA for the determination of the inhibitory capacity of an oligopeptide, which was designed to compete with the IFNLs at their receptor binding site. Analytical steps to estimate KD and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values are described. Finally, the discussion highlights advantages and disadvantages of the presented method and how the results enable a better molecular understanding of ligand-receptor interactions.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveBinding SitesBiophysical PhenomenaCarrier ProteinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayInterferon LambdaInterferonsInterleukinsLigandsProtein BindingReceptors, CytokineReceptors, InterferonCarrier ProteinsIFNLR1 protein, humanInterferon Lambdainterferon-lambda, humanInterferonsInterleukinsLigandsReceptors, CytokineReceptors, Interferon

Identifiers

PMID27023275
PMCPMC4828978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.