Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27022964›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Methadone as first-line opioid treatment for cancer pain in a developing country palliative care unit.

Gabriela P Peirano, Guillermo P Mammana, Mariela S Bertolino, Tania Pastrana, Gloria F Vega, Jorgelina Russo, Gabriela Varela, Ernesto Vignaroli, Raúl Ruggiero, Arnaldo Armesto and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First-line methadone for cancer pain: titration time analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gabriela P PeiranoUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Guillermo P MammanaUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariela S BertolinoUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Tania PastranaPalliative Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Gloria F VegaUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jorgelina RussoUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriela VarelaUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ernesto VignaroliUnidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Raúl RuggieroLaboratorio de Oncología Experimental, Instituto de Medicina Experimental IMEX-CONICET-Academia Nacional De Medicina, José Andrés Pacheco de Melo 3081. C1425AUM, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arnaldo ArmestoDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine-University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriela CameranoLaboratorio de Oncología Experimental, Instituto de Medicina Experimental IMEX-CONICET-Academia Nacional De Medicina, José Andrés Pacheco de Melo 3081. C1425AUM, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Graciela DranLaboratorio de Oncología Experimental, Instituto de Medicina Experimental IMEX-CONICET-Academia Nacional De Medicina, José Andrés Pacheco de Melo 3081. C1425AUM, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. gcolodran@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe use of methadone for cancer pain is limited by the need of expertise and close titration due to variable half-life. Yet, it is a helpful palliative strategy in low-resources countries given its long-acting effect at low cost and worth additional study. Our aim was to describe the prescription and outcomes of methadone as a first-line treatment for cancer pain in a tertiary palliative care unit (PCU) in Argentina.

methodsRetrospective review of medical records of patients with moderate to severe cancer pain seen at the PCU in 1-year period, who initiated strong opioids at the first consultation. Data collected during the first month of treatment included disease and pain characteristics, initial and final opioid type and dose and need for opioid rotation.

resultsMethadone was the most frequent opioid both at the initial and last assessment (71 and 66 % of the prescriptions). In all, treatment with strong opioids provided considerable decrease in pain intensity (p < 0.001) with low and stable opioid dose. Median and interquartile range (IR) of oral morphine equivalent daily dose (OMEDD) was 26 (16-32) and 39 (32-55) mg for initial and final assessments, respectively (p = 0.3). In patients initiated with methadone, the median (IR) daily methadone dose was 5 (4-6) mg at first and 7.5 (6-10) mg at final assessment, and the median (IR) index of opioid escalation was 0 (0-4) mg; (p < 0.05). Patients on methadone underwent less percentage of opioid rotation (15 versus 50 %; p < 0.001) and longer time to rotation (20.6 ± 4.4 versus 9.0 ± 2.7 days; p < 0.001) than patients on other opioids.

conclusionsResults indicate the preference of methadone as first-line strong opioid treatment in a PCU, providing good pain relief at low doses with low need for rotation. Several considerations about the costs of strong opioids in the region are given.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPain MeasurementPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadoneCancer painDeveloping countriesFirst-line strong opioidMethadone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.