Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27022947›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2016

Particulate Matter Exposure and Preterm Birth: Estimates of U.S. Attributable Burden and Economic Costs.

Leonardo Trasande, Patrick Malecha, Teresa M Attina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Equipping perinatal teams to practice climate-smart healthcare.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Growth in preterm infants and its relationship with metabolic profile and diet].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PMMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Before the first breath: why ambient air pollution and climate change should matter to neonatal-perinatal providers.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Trimester-specific ambient PMEnvironmental research · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Association of Prematurity and Low Birth Weight with Gestational Exposure to PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonardo TrasandeDepartment of Pediatrics, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Patrick Malecha
Teresa M Attina

Funding

RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES (CENTER GRANT)P30ES000260 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GOLDBERG, JUDITH D. · 1985 to 2020
$26.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) rates (11.4% in 2013) in the United States remain high and are a substantial cause of morbidity. Studies of prenatal exposure have associated particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) and other ambient air pollutants with adverse birth outcomes; yet, to our knowledge, burden and costs of PM2.5-attributable PTB have not been estimated in the United States.

objectivesWe aimed to estimate burden of PTB in the United States and economic costs attributable to PM2.5 exposure in 2010.

methodsAnnual deciles of PM2.5 were obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We converted PTB odds ratio (OR), identified in a previous meta-analysis (1.15 per 10 μg/m3 for our base case, 1.07-1.16 for low- and high-end scenarios) to relative risk (RRs), to obtain an estimate that better represents the true relative risk. A reference level (RL) of 8.8 μg/m3 was applied. We then used the RR estimates and county-level PTB prevalence to quantify PM2.5-attributable PTB. Direct medical costs were obtained from the 2007 Institute of Medicine report, and lost economic productivity (LEP) was estimated using a meta-analysis of PTB-associated IQ loss, and well-established relationships of IQ loss with LEP. All costs were calculated using 2010 dollars.

resultsAn estimated 3.32% of PTBs nationally (corresponding to 15,808 PTBs) in 2010 could be attributed to PM2.5 (PM2.5 > 8.8 μg/m3). Attributable PTBs cost were estimated at $5.09 billion [sensitivity analysis (SA): $2.43-9.66 B], of which $760 million were spent for medical care (SA: $362 M-1.44 B). The estimated PM2.5 attributable fraction (AF) of PTB was highest in urban counties, with highest AFs in the Ohio Valley and the southern United States.

conclusionsPM2.5 may contribute substantially to burden and costs of PTB in the United States, and considerable health and economic benefits could be achieved through environmental regulatory interventions that reduce PM2.5 exposure in pregnancy. Citation: Trasande L, Malecha P, Attina TM. 2016. Particulate matter exposure and preterm birth: estimates of U.S. attributable burden and economic costs. Environ Health Perspect 124:1913-1918; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510810.

Indexed as

Maternal ExposureAdultAir PollutantsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParticulate MatterPregnancyPremature BirthPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRiskUnited StatesAir PollutantsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID27022947
PMCPMC5132647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.