Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27022891›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2016

Human-induced pluripotent stem cell approaches to model inborn and acquired metabolic heart diseases.

Anita M Chanana, June-Wha Rhee, Joseph C Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Inborn errors of metabolism: Lessons from iPSC models.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anita M ChananaaStanford Cardiovascular Institute bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology cDepartment of Radiology dInstitute of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
June-Wha Rhee
Joseph C Wu

Funding

Elucidating Mechanism of Cardiac Fibrosis with Cell Village of Pooled Human iPSCsR01HL130020 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ronglih Liao, MARK MERCOLA · 2016 to 2026
$7.3M
Genome Editing of Human iPSCs to Study Inherited Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyR01HL126527 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI QI, LEI STANLEY, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2015 to 2022
$5.4M
A Systems Biology Approach to Study Cardiac Arrhythmias: iPS Cells and In Silico ModelingR01HL128170 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2018
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126527NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128170NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe article provides an overview of advances in the induced pluripotent stem cell field to model cardiomyopathies of inherited inborn errors of metabolism and acquired metabolic syndromes in vitro. RECENT

findingsSeveral inborn errors of metabolism have been studied using 'disease in a dish' models, including Pompe disease, Danon disease, Fabry disease, and Barth syndrome. Disease phenotypes of complex metabolic syndromes, such as diabetes mellitus and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 deficiency, have also been observed. SUMMARY: Differentiation of patient and disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes has provided the capacity to model deleterious cardiometabolic diseases to understand molecular mechanisms, perform drug screens, and identify novel drug targets.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsModels, BiologicalCarbohydrate MetabolismHumans

Identifiers

PMID27022891
PMCPMC4974114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.