ReviewCurrent opinion in cardiology2016
Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.
Review in Current opinion in cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of perioperative renal function in patients undergoing heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device implantation: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Urinary biomarkers associated with acute kidney injury in pediatric mechanical circulatory support patients.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Data Analysis of Impaired Renal and Cardiac Function Using a Combination of Standard Classifiers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The trajectory of renal function following mechanical circulatory support and subsequent heart transplantation.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- HFA of the ESC position paper on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider Part 3: at the hospital and discharge.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Cardiac Outcomes in Isolated Heart and Simultaneous Kidney and Heart Transplants in the United States.Kidney international reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to describe the effects of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on changes in kidney function and their relationship with mortality, with an additional focus on the evaluation and management of both preimplant and post-MCS renal dysfunction. RECENT
findingsRenal dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients referred for MCS and is associated with significantly increased mortality and postoperative acute kidney injury. Most patients, including those with renal dysfunction, experience marked early improvement in renal function with MCS, likely secondary to correction of the cardiogenic shock, volume overload, and neurohormonal activation characteristic of advanced heart failure. Currently, there are no diagnostic tests to definitively distinguish reversible forms of renal dysfunction likely to improve with MCS from irreversible renal dysfunction. Furthermore, the characteristic improvements in renal function observed in the early months of MCS are often transient, with subsequent recurrence of renal dysfunction with longer durations of support. Venous congestion, right ventricular dysfunction, and reduced pulsatility are potential mechanisms involved in resurgence of renal dysfunction following MCS. SUMMARY: With the exponential growth of MCS, research endeavors to both improve understanding of the mechanisms behind observed changes in renal function and elucidate the device-related effects on the kidney are imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.