Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27022822›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2016

Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Robert W Yeh, Eric A Secemsky, Dean J Kereiakes, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Anthony H Gershlick, David J Cohen, John A Spertus, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Donald E Cutlip, Michael J Rinaldi and 7 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 339 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
339citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
90.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00977938 phase4completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of 12 Versus 30 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Subjects Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Either Drug-eluting Stent or Bare Metal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaim Institute for Clinical ResearchRan2009 to 2014Enrolled25,682ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsPlacebo & Aspirin, Clopidogrel & Aspirin, Prasugrel & Aspirin
NCT03729401 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Personalization of Long-Term Antiplatelet Therapy Using a Novel Combined Demographic/Pharmacogenomic Strategy - The RAPID EXTEND Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Heart Institute Research CorporationRan2019 to 2026Enrolled39ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Myocardial InfarctionArmsActive Comparator: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) - Aspirin 81 mg + Ticagrelor 60mg twice daily, Ticagrelor Monotherapy: Ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily, Personalized Therapy Arm: Aspirin 81 mg or Ticagrelor 60mg twice daily or Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily
NCT04135989 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Randomized 2x2 Factorial Trial Comparing the Cre8 Amphilimus-sirolimus Eluting Stent vs. the Synergy Everolimus-eluting Stent and a Personalized vs. Standard Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in All-comers Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederico II UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled2,106ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Chronic Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial InfarctionArmsPercutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of amphilimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease., Percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of everolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease., Personalized DAPT duration, Standard DAPT duration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

339 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 902 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Utility of the dual antiplatelet therapy score to guide antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Polymer-free versus biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an assessor-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Prediction of radial crossover in acute coronary syndromes: derivation and validation of the MATRIX score.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Matching depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: results of the Target-D randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Trial

279 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert W YehSmith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric A SecemskyHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts4Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Dean J KereiakesChrist Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Cincinnati, Ohio6Lindner Center for Research and Education, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sharon-Lise T NormandHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts7Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anthony H GershlickDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom9National Institute for Health Research Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester.
David J CohenSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri11University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.
John A SpertusSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri11University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri12Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Philippe Gabriel StegUniversité Paris-Diderot, INSERM U-1148, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France14Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Fibrosis, Inflammation, and Remodeling, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France15National Heart and Lung Institute, Institute of Card.
Donald E CutlipHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts16Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael J RinaldiSanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Edoardo CamenzindInstitut Loraine du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, University Hospital of Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
William WijnsCardiovascular Center, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.
Patricia K ApruzzeseHarvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yang SongHarvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joseph M MassaroHarvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts20Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura MauriHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts3Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts21Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
DAPT Study Investigators
Baim Institute for Clinical Research · USHarvard University · USCarolinas Healthcare System · USDélégation Paris 7 · FRGlenfield Hospital · GBLindner Center of HOPE · USOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BESaint Luke's Hospital · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY TRIAL: Research Project Grant (R01)R01FD003870 · FDA · HARVARD CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MAURI, LAURA · 2009 to 2009
$1.5M
Balancing the Risks of Ischemia and Bleeding in Percutaneous Coronary InterventioK23HL118138 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YEH, ROBERT · 2013 to 2017
$740k
FDA HHS R01 FD003870NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL118138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceDual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces ischemia but increases bleeding.

objectiveTo develop a clinical decision tool to identify patients expected to derive benefit vs harm from continuing thienopyridine beyond 1 year after PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsAmong 11,648 randomized DAPT Study patients from 11 countries (August 2009-May 2014), a prediction rule was derived stratifying patients into groups to distinguish ischemic and bleeding risk 12 to 30 months after PCI. Validation was internal via bootstrap resampling and external among 8136 patients from 36 countries randomized in the PROTECT trial (June 2007-July 2014). EXPOSURES: Twelve months of open-label thienopyridine plus aspirin, then randomized to 18 months of continued thienopyridine plus aspirin vs placebo plus aspirin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ischemia (myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis) and bleeding (moderate or severe) 12 to 30 months after PCI.

resultsAmong DAPT Study patients (derivation cohort; mean age, 61.3 years; women, 25.1%), ischemia occurred in 348 patients (3.0%) and bleeding in 215 (1.8%). Derivation cohort models predicting ischemia and bleeding had c statistics of 0.70 and 0.68, respectively. The prediction rule assigned 1 point each for myocardial infarction at presentation, prior myocardial infarction or PCI, diabetes, stent diameter less than 3 mm, smoking, and paclitaxel-eluting stent; 2 points each for history of congestive heart failure/low ejection fraction and vein graft intervention; -1 point for age 65 to younger than 75 years; and -2 points for age 75 years or older. Among the high score group (score ≥2, n = 5917), continued thienopyridine vs placebo was associated with reduced ischemic events (2.7% vs 5.7%; risk difference [RD], -3.0% [95% CI, -4.1% to -2.0%], P < .001) compared with the low score group (score <2, n = 5731; 1.7% vs 2.3%; RD, -0.7% [95% CI, -1.4% to 0.09%], P = .07; interaction P < .001). Conversely, continued thienopyridine was associated with smaller increases in bleeding among the high score group (1.8% vs 1.4%; RD, 0.4% [95% CI, -0.3% to 1.0%], P = .26) compared with the low score group (3.0% vs 1.4%; RD, 1.5% [95% CI, 0.8% to 2.3%], P < .001; interaction P = .02). Among PROTECT patients (validation cohort; mean age, 62 years; women, 23.7%), ischemia occurred in 79 patients (1.0%) and bleeding in 37 (0.5%), with a c statistic of 0.64 for ischemia and 0.64 for bleeding. In this cohort, the high-score patients (n = 2848) had increased ischemic events compared with the low-score patients and no significant difference in bleeding. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among patients not sustaining major bleeding or ischemic events 1 year after PCI, a prediction rule assessing late ischemic and bleeding risks to inform dual antiplatelet therapy duration showed modest accuracy in derivation and validation cohorts. This rule requires further prospective evaluation to assess potential effects on patient care, as well as validation in other cohorts.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00977938.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAspirinDiabetes MellitusDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHemorrhageHumansIschemiaLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPaclitaxelAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAspirinPaclitaxelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPyridinesthienopyridine

Identifiers

PMID27022822
PMCPMC5408574
OpenAlexW2324839838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.