Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27022202›Full record

ArticleProgress in polymer science2016

Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Fa-Ming Chen, Xiaohua Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in polymer science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 326 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
326citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
48.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

326 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bone regenerative capacity of the newly synthesized material QG3030: anJournal of periodontal & implant science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

266 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fa-Ming Chen;
Xiaohua Liu
Air Force Medical University · CNBaylor University · US

Funding

Nanofibrous Hollow Microspheres for Bone RegenerationR03DE022838 · NIDCR · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI LIU, XIAOHUA · 2013 to 2014
$218k
Novel Pharmacotherapeutic Bioadhesive Patch for Oral UlcerationsR41DE024343 · NIDCR · POST OAK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI LIU, XIAOHUA · 2014 to 2014
$152k
NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE022838NIDCR NIH HHS R41 DE024343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterials have played an increasingly prominent role in the success of biomedical devices and in the development of tissue engineering, which seeks to unlock the regenerative potential innate to human tissues/organs in a state of deterioration and to restore or reestablish normal bodily function. Advances in our understanding of regenerative biomaterials and their roles in new tissue formation can potentially open a new frontier in the fast-growing field of regenerative medicine. Taking inspiration from the role and multi-component construction of native extracellular matrices (ECMs) for cell accommodation, the synthetic biomaterials produced today routinely incorporate biologically active components to define an artificial

Indexed as

Biomimetic designBiopolymersBlood-derived biomaterialsExtracellular matrixRaw materialsTissue decellularizationTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID27022202
PMCPMC4808059
OpenAlexW2044242789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.