Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27022157›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016

Centralizing content and distributing labor: a community model for curating the very long tail of microbial genomes.

Tim E Putman, Sebastian Burgstaller-Muehlbacher, Andra Waagmeester, Chunlei Wu, Andrew I Su, Benjamin M Good

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ChlamBase: a curated model organism database for the Chlamydia research community.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim E PutmanDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA.
Sebastian Burgstaller-MuehlbacherDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA.
Andra WaagmeesterMicelio, Antwerp, Belgium bgood@scripps.edu asu@scripps.edu.
Chunlei WuDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA.
Andrew I SuDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA bgood@scripps.edu asu@scripps.edu.
Benjamin M GoodDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA bgood@scripps.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · USTerumo (Belgium) · BE

Funding

SOC CoreU54DA036134 · NIDA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GALAS, DAVID J., GERSTEIN, MARK BENDER · 2013 to 2018
$15.0M
TRAININGU54GM114833 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LINDSEY, MERRY L., PING, PEIPEI · 2014 to 2017
$13.8M
BioGPS: Extensible Web 2.0 gene portal for structured and unstructured annotationR01GM083924 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SU, ANDREW I, WU, CHUNLEI · 2008 to 2021
$5.6M
The Gene Wiki: Community intelligence applied to gene annotationR01GM089820 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SU, ANDREW I · 2010 to 2021
$5.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA036134NIGMS NIH HHS GM083924NIGMS NIH HHS GM089820NIGMS NIH HHS GM114833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last 20 years of advancement in sequencing technologies have led to sequencing thousands of microbial genomes, creating mountains of genetic data. While efficiency in generating the data improves almost daily, applying meaningful relationships between taxonomic and genetic entities on this scale requires a structured and integrative approach. Currently, knowledge is distributed across a fragmented landscape of resources from government-funded institutions such as National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and UniProt to topic-focused databases like the ODB3 database of prokaryotic operons, to the supplemental table of a primary publication. A major drawback to large scale, expert-curated databases is the expense of maintaining and extending them over time. No entity apart from a major institution with stable long-term funding can consider this, and their scope is limited considering the magnitude of microbial data being generated daily. Wikidata is an openly editable, semantic web compatible framework for knowledge representation. It is a project of the Wikimedia Foundation and offers knowledge integration capabilities ideally suited to the challenge of representing the exploding body of information about microbial genomics. We are developing a microbial specific data model, based on Wikidata's semantic web compatibility, which represents bacterial species, strains and the gene and gene products that define them. Currently, we have loaded 43,694 gene and 37,966 protein items for 21 species of bacteria, including the human pathogenic bacteriaChlamydia trachomatis.Using this pathogen as an example, we explore complex interactions between the pathogen, its host, associated genes, other microbes, disease and drugs using the Wikidata SPARQL endpoint. In our next phase of development, we will add another 99 bacterial genomes and their gene and gene products, totaling ∼900,000 additional entities. This aggregation of knowledge will be a platform for community-driven collaboration, allowing the networking of microbial genetic data through the sharing of knowledge by both the data and domain expert.

Indexed as

Data CurationGenome, MicrobialModels, TheoreticalFemaleGene OntologyGenes, BacterialHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationOperonSearch Engine

Identifiers

PMID27022157
PMCPMC4822648
OpenAlexW2332067735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.