Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27021938›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2016

Thalamus plays a central role in ongoing cortical functioning.

S Murray Sherman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 428 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
428citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

428 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heart rate control by listening to light.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Thalamocortical orchestration of human theory of mind.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

368 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S Murray ShermanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Functional relationships between visual cortex and thalamusR01EY022338 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHERMAN, S. MURRAY · 2012 to 2020
$3.6M
Information processing in sensory systemsR01DC008794 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SHERMAN, S. MURRAY · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY022338NIDCD NIH HHS DC008794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several challenges to current views of thalamocortical processing are offered here. Glutamatergic pathways in thalamus and cortex are divided into two distinct classes: driver and modulator. We suggest that driver inputs are the main conduits of information and that modulator inputs modify how driver inputs are processed. Different driver sources reveal two types of thalamic relays: first order relays receive subcortical driver input (for example, retinal input to the lateral geniculate nucleus), whereas higher order relays (for example, pulvinar) receive driver input from layer 5 of cortex and participate in cortico-thalamo-cortical (or transthalamic) circuits. These transthalamic circuits represent an unappreciated aspect of cortical functioning, which I discuss here. Direct corticocortical connections are often paralleled by transthalamic ones. Furthermore, driver inputs to thalamus, both first and higher order, typically arrive via branching axons, and the transthalamic branch often innervates subcortical motor centers, leading to the suggestion that these inputs to thalamus serve as efference copies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexGlutamic AcidHumansNerve NetNeural PathwaysThalamusGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27021938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.