Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27021489›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2016

Old cells, new tricks: chromatin structure in senescence.

Aled John Parry, Masashi Narita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Interrogating the regulatory epigenome of cellular senescence.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Aging mechanisms-A perspective mostly fromAdvanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HMGA Genes and Proteins in Development and Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aled John ParryLi Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
Masashi NaritaLi Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK. masashi.narita@cruk.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence is a stable form of cell cycle arrest with roles in many pathophysiological processes including development, tissue repair, cancer, and aging. Senescence does not represent a single entity but rather a heterogeneous phenotype that depends on the trigger and cell type of origin. Such heterogeneous features include alterations to chromatin structure and epigenetic states. New technologies are beginning to unravel the distinct mechanisms regulating chromatin structure during senescence. Here, we describe the multiple levels of chromatin organization associated with senescence: global and focal, linear, and higher order.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCellular SenescenceChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticGenome, HumanHeterochromatinHumansChromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID27021489
PMCPMC4935760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.