Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27021334›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2016

Poor agreement of objectively measured and self-reported physical activity in juvenile dermatomyositis and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus.

Ana Jéssica Pinto, Hamilton Roschel, Fabiana Braga Benatti, Ana Lúcia de Sá Pinto, Adriana Maluf Elias Sallum, Clóvis Arthur Silva, Bruno Gualano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Poor Agreement between Responses to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and Objective ActiGraphInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Update on outcome assessment in myositis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Jéssica PintoApplied Physiology in Nutrition, Exercise and Genetics Research Group, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 65, Sao Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil.
Hamilton RoschelApplied Physiology in Nutrition, Exercise and Genetics Research Group, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 65, Sao Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil.
Fabiana Braga BenattiApplied Physiology in Nutrition, Exercise and Genetics Research Group, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 65, Sao Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil.
Ana Lúcia de Sá PintoRheumatology Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 - 3rd floor - Room 3190, Sao Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil.
Adriana Maluf Elias SallumPediatric Rheumatology Unit, Children's Institute, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 647, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Clóvis Arthur SilvaPediatric Rheumatology Unit, Children's Institute, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 647, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Bruno GualanoApplied Physiology in Nutrition, Exercise and Genetics Research Group, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 65, Sao Paulo, SP, 05508-030, Brazil. gualano@usp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the agreement and association between objectively measured and indirectly assessed physical activity levels in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) patients. The sample consisted of 19 JDM patients (age 8 to 22 years) and 20 JSLE patients (age 9 to 18 years). Physical activity level was objectively measured using Actigraph® accelerometers and indirectly assessed by the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to test possible associations between physical activity levels across the two instruments. The Bland-Altman technique was used to calculate bias and limits of agreement. Correlations between objectively measured and indirectly assessed physical activity levels in JDM and JSLE were weak, varying from R = 0.03 to R = 0.33 (all p > 0.05). Total physical activity was correlated between accelerometer and IPAQ in JSLE (R = 0.51, p = 0.021). Bland-Altman analyses suggested that IPAQ tended to highly underestimate sedentary time and light physical activity in JDM (mean bias 105.7 and 199.8 min, respectively) and JSLE (mean bias 36.4 and 127.8 min, respectively). Mean biases of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were also highly variable, ranging from -42.9 to 54.9 min and -59.4 to 89.8 min for JDM and JSLE, respectively. IPAQ was shown to not be valid to assess physical activity levels in patients with JDM and JSLE when compared against accelerometry. While the validation of reliable self-reported instruments that measure physical activity in pediatric rheumatic patients remains necessary, the use of validated tools that objectively measure physical activity is recommended in both clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

ExerciseActigraphyAdolescentBrazilChildDermatomyositisExercise TestFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAccelerometerIPAQPediatric rheumatic diseasePhysical activity level

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.