Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27020904›Full record

ReviewTrends in cardiovascular medicine2016

Stem cell therapy for heart failure: Ensuring regenerative proficiency.

Andre Terzic, Atta Behfar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mass Customized Outlook for Regenerative Heart Failure Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Longevity leap: mind the healthspan gap.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Brachyury engineers cardiac repair competent stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andre TerzicCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: terzic.andre@mayo.edu.
Atta BehfarCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

Cardioprotective Repair through CardiopoiesisR01HL083439 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TERZIC, ANDRE · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived stem cells enable promising regenerative strategies, but display heterogenous cardiac reparative proficiency, leading to unpredictable therapeutic outcomes impeding practice adoption. Means to establish and certify the regenerative potency of emerging biotherapies are thus warranted. In this era of clinomics, deconvolution of variant cytoreparative performance in clinical trials offers an unprecedented opportunity to map pathways that segregate regenerative from non-regenerative states informing the evolution of cardio-regenerative quality systems. A maiden example of this approach is cardiopoiesis-mediated lineage specification developed to ensure regenerative performance. Successfully tested in pre-clinical and early clinical studies, the safety and efficacy of the cardiopoietic stem cell phenotype is undergoing validation in pivotal trials for chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy offering the prospect of a next-generation regenerative solution for heart failure.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationRegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageDiffusion of InnovationHeart FailureHumansMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPhenotypeRecovery of FunctionTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment OutcomeCardiopoiesisCardiopoietic stem cellCardiovascular diseaseClinical trialClinomicsEpidemicHealth careMyocardial infarctionNext generationQualityRegenerative medicineSystem

Identifiers

PMID27020904
PMCPMC4912443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.