Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27020140›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2016

Neural correlates for perception of companion animal photographs.

Sara Hayama, Linda Chang, Kazim Gumus, George R King, Thomas Ernst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara HayamaJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa Neuroscience and MR Research Program, 1356 Lusitana Street, 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. Electronic address: saraaw@hawaii.edu.
Linda ChangJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa Neuroscience and MR Research Program, 1356 Lusitana Street, 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. Electronic address: lchang@hawaii.edu.
Kazim GumusJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa Neuroscience and MR Research Program, 1356 Lusitana Street, 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA; Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Biophysics, Talas Yolu üzeri, Melikgazi, Kayseri 38039, Turkey. Electronic address: kzgumus@erciyes.edu.tr.
George R KingJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa Neuroscience and MR Research Program, 1356 Lusitana Street, 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. Electronic address: grking@hawaii.edu.
Thomas ErnstJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa Neuroscience and MR Research Program, 1356 Lusitana Street, 7th Floor, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. Electronic address: tmernst@hawaii.edu.
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USErciyes University · TR

Funding

WORLDWIDE EPIDEMIOLOGY &EPIZOOTIOLOGY OF HANTAVIRUSG12RR003061 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI COUVILLON, PATRICIA A · 1986 to 2011
$32.3M
RESEARCH DESIGN, BIOSTATISTICS AND RESEARCH ETHICS COREG12MD007601 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BERRY, MARLA J · 2012 to 2016
$13.0M
Imaging Studies in Neurotoxicity and NeurodevelopmentU54NS056883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI CHANG, LINDA · 2007 to 2011
$8.4M
Neuroimaging and Mentoring in Drug Abuse ResearchK24DA016170 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI CHANG, LINDA · 2003 to 2013
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS G12 RR003061NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA016170NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007601NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS056883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrozoological neuroscience, which we propose as the use of neuroscience techniques to study human-animal interaction, may help to elucidate mechanisms underlying the associated psychological, physiological, and other purported health effects. This preliminary study investigates the neural response to animal photographs in pet owners and non-pet owners, and both attraction and attachment to companion animals as modulators of human perception of companion animal photographs. Thirty male participants, 15 "Pet Owners" (PO) and 15 "Non-Pet Owners" (NPO), viewed photographs of companion animals during functional MRI (fMRI) scans at 3 T and provided ratings of attraction to the animal species represented in the photographs. Fourteen subjects additionally submitted and viewed personal pet photographs during fMRI scans, and completed the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). PO exhibited greater activation than NPO during the viewing of animal photographs in areas of the insula, and frontal and occipital cortices. Moreover, ratings of attraction to animals correlated positively with neural activation in the cingulate gyrus, precentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and superior temporal gyrus during the viewing of representative photographs. For subjects with household pets, scores on the LAPS correlated positively with neural activation during the viewing of owned pet photographs in the precuneus, cuneus, and superior parietal lobule. Our preliminary findings suggest that human perception of companion animals involve the visual attention network, which may be modulated at the neural level by subjective experiences of attraction or attachment to animals. Our understanding of human-animal interactions through anthrozoological neuroscience may better direct therapeutic applications, such as animal-assisted therapy.

Indexed as

Brain MappingObject AttachmentOwnershipAdultAnimalsCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPattern Recognition, VisualPetsPhotic StimulationOxygenAnthrozoological neuroscienceCompanion animalsfMRIHuman-animal interactionPet ownership

Identifiers

PMID27020140
PMCPMC6502473
OpenAlexW2311881263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.