Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27019867›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2016

A Survey of Knowledge and Views Concerning Genetic and Amyloid PET Status Disclosure.

B R Ott, M A Pelosi, G Tremont, P J Snyder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Trial.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B R OttRhode Island Hospital, Department of Nzeurology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence, RI.
M A PelosiRhode Island Hospital, Department of Nzeurology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence, RI.
G TremontPsychiatry and Human Behavior; Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence, RI.
P J SnyderRhode Island Hospital, Department of Nzeurology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence, RI.

Funding

TRIAL OF VALPROATE TO ATTENUATE THE PROGRESSION OF ADU01AG010483 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI AISEN, PAUL S. · 1991 to 2012
$116.2M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG010483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis survey characterizes viewpoints of cognitively intact at-risk participants in an Alzheimer prevention registry if given the opportunity to learn their genetic and amyloid PET status.

methods207 participants were offered a 25-item survey. They were asked if they wished to know their ApoE and amyloid PET status, and if so, reasons for wanting to know, or not, and the effects of such information on life plans.

results164 (79.2%) of registrants completed the survey. Among those who were unaware of their ApoE or amyloid PET results, 80% desired to know this information. The most common reasons for wanting disclosure were to participate in research, to arrange personal affairs, to prepare family for illness, and to move life plans closer into the future. When asked if disclosure would help with making plans to end one's life when starting to lose their memory, 12.7% vs. 11.5% responded yes for ApoE and amyloid PET disclosures, respectively. Disclosure of these test results, if required for participation in a clinical trial, would make 15% of people less likely to participate. Likelihood of participation in prevention research and the desire to know test results were not related to scores on brief tests of knowledge about the tests. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that stakeholders in AD prevention research generally wish to know biological test information about their risk for developing AD to assist in making life plans.

Indexed as

Alzheimeramyloidapolipoprotein Eclinical trialsPETpreventionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID27019867
PMCPMC4804344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.