Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27019850›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2016

Identification of Deleterious Mutations in Myostatin Gene of Rohu Carp (Labeo rohita) Using Modeling and Molecular Dynamic Simulation Approaches.

Kiran Dashrath Rasal, Vemulawada Chakrapani, Swagat Kumar Patra, Shibani D Mohapatra, Swapnarani Nayak, Sasmita Jena, Jitendra Kumar Sundaray, Pallipuram Jayasankar, Hirak Kumar Barman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zebrafish models of sarcopenia.Disease models & mechanisms · 2020
    Review
  2. Molecular characterization and expression patterns ofJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiran Dashrath RasalFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Vemulawada ChakrapaniFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Swagat Kumar PatraFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Shibani D MohapatraFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Swapnarani NayakFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Sasmita JenaFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Jitendra Kumar SundarayFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Pallipuram JayasankarFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Hirak Kumar BarmanFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (ICAR), Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 002, India.
Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The myostatin (MSTN) is a known negative growth regulator of skeletal muscle. The mutated myostatin showed a double-muscular phenotype having a positive significance for the farmed animals. Consequently, adequate information is not available in the teleosts, including farmed rohu carp, Labeo rohita. In the absence of experimental evidence, computational algorithms were utilized in predicting the impact of point mutation of rohu myostatin, especially its structural and functional relationships. The four mutations were generated at different positions (p.D76A, p.Q204P, p.C312Y, and p.D313A) of MSTN protein of rohu. The impacts of each mutant were analyzed using SIFT, I-Mutant 2.0, PANTHER, and PROVEAN, wherein two substitutions (p.D76A and p.Q204P) were predicted as deleterious. The comparative structural analysis of each mutant protein with the native was explored using 3D modeling as well as molecular-dynamic simulation techniques. The simulation showed altered dynamic behaviors concerning RMSD and RMSF, for either p.D76A or p.Q204P substitution, when compared with the native counterpart. Interestingly, incorporated two mutations imposed a significant negative impact on protein structure and stability. The present study provided the first-hand information in identifying possible amino acids, where mutations could be incorporated into MSTN gene of rohu carp including other carps for undertaking further in vivo studies.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCypriniformesFish ProteinsMyostatinFish ProteinsMyostatin

Identifiers

PMID27019850
PMCPMC4785247
OpenAlexW2282594997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.