Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27019550›Full record

ArticleSensors and actuators. B, Chemical2016

3-D Printed Adjustable Microelectrode Arrays for Electrochemical Sensing and Biosensing.

Haipeng Yang, Taibur Rahman, Dan Du, Rahul Panat, Yuehe Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Fabrication and Validation of Sub-Cellular Carbon Fiber Electrodes.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Haipeng YangSchool of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States; College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanshan District Key Lab for Biopolymers and Safety Evaluation, and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Special Functional Materials, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, P.R. China.
Taibur RahmanSchool of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States.
Dan DuSchool of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States.
Rahul PanatSchool of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States.
Yuehe LinSchool of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States.
Washington State University · US

Funding

Integrated Approach for Environmental Health Monitoring: Exposure Signatures of PesticidesR21OH010768 · OH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DU, DAN · 2015 to 2016
$415k
NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH010768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Printed Electronics has emerged as an important fabrication technique that overcomes several shortcomings of conventional lithography and provides custom rapid prototyping for various sensor applications. In this work, silver microelectrode arrays (MEA) with three different electrode spacing were fabricated using 3-D printing by the aerosol jet technology. The microelectrodes were printed at a length scale of about 15 μm, with the space between the electrodes accurately controlled to about 2 times (30 μm, MEA30), 6.6 times (100 μm, MEA100) and 12 times (180 μm, MEA180) the trace width, respectively. Hydrogen peroxide and glucose were chosen as model analytes to demonstrate the performance of the MEA for sensor applications. The electrodes are shown to reduce hydrogen peroxide with a reduction current proportional to the concentration of hydrogen peroxide for certain concentration ranges. Further, the sensitivity of the current for the three electrode configurations was shown to decrease with an increase in the microelectrode spacing (sensitivity of MEA30: MEA100: MEA180 was in the ratio of 3.7: 2.8: 1), demonstrating optimal MEA geometry for such applications. The noise of the different electrode configurations is also characterized and shows a dramatic reduction from MEA30 to MEA100 and MEA180 electrodes. Further, it is shown that the response current is proportional to MEA100 and MEA180 electrode areas, but not for the area of MEA30 electrode (the current density of MEA30 : MEA100 : MEA180 is 0.25 : 1 : 1), indicating that the MEA30 electrodes suffer from diffusion overlap from neighboring electrodes. The work thus establishes the lower limit of microelectrode spacing for our geometry. The lowest detection limit of the MEAs was calculated (with S/N = 3) to be 0.45 μM. Glucose oxidase was immobilized on MEA100 microelectrodes to demonstrate a glucose biosensor application. The sensitivity of glucose biosensor was 1.73 μAmM

Indexed as

biosensorelectrochemical sensorhydrogen peroxidemicro additive manufacturingmicroelectrode arrays

Identifiers

PMID27019550
PMCPMC4802967
OpenAlexW2280620697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.