Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27019146›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2016

Quantification of cellular and nuclear uptake rates of polymeric gene delivery nanoparticles and DNA plasmids via flow cytometry.

Corey J Bishop, Rebecca L Majewski, Toni-Rose M Guiriba, David R Wilson, Nupura S Bhise, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa, Jordan J Green

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanoparticles for Stem Cell Therapy Bioengineering in Glioma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biodegradable STING agonist nanoparticles for enhanced cancer immunotherapy.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2018
    Article
  17. Nanotherapeutic systems for local treatment of brain tumors.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corey J BishopDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Rebecca L MajewskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Toni-Rose M GuiribaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
David R WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Nupura S BhiseDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Alfredo Quiñones-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Jordan J GreenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. Electronic address: green@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Wilmer Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY001765 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jiang Qian · 1985 to 2026
$22.1M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Gene Delivery Nanoparticles to Treat GlioblastomaR01EB016721 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, JORDAN · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001765NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016721NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledNon-viral, biomaterial-mediated gene delivery has the potential to treat many diseases, but is limited by low efficacy. Elucidating the bottlenecks of plasmid mass transfer can enable an improved understanding of biomaterial structure-function relationships, leading to next-generation rationally designed non-viral gene delivery vectors. As proof of principle, we transfected human primary glioblastoma cells using a poly(beta-amino ester) complexed with eGFP plasmid DNA. The polyplexes transfected 70.6±0.6% of the cells with 101±3% viability. The amount of DNA within the cytoplasm, nuclear envelope, and nuclei was assessed at multiple time points using fluorescent dye conjugated plasmid up to 24h post-transfection using a quantitative multi-well plate-based flow cytometry assay. Conversion to plasmid counts and degradation kinetics were accounted for via quantitative PCR (plasmid degradation rate constants were determined to be 0.62h(-1) and 0.084h(-1) for fast and slow phases respectively). Quantitative cellular uptake, nuclear association, and nuclear uptake rate constants were determined by using a four-compartment first order mass-action model. The rate limiting step for these poly(beta-amino ester)/DNA polyplex nanoparticles was determined to be cellular uptake (7.5×10(-4)h(-1)) and only 0.1% of the added dose was taken up by the human brain cancer cells, whereas 12% of internalized DNA successfully entered the nucleus (the rate of nuclear internalization of nuclear associated plasmid was 1.1h(-1)). We describe an efficient new method for assessing cellular and nuclear uptake rates of non-viral gene delivery nanoparticles using flow cytometry to improve understanding and design of polymeric gene delivery nanoparticles. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this work, a quantitative high throughput flow cytometry-based assay and computational modeling approach was developed for assessing cellular and nuclear uptake rates of non-viral gene delivery nanoparticles. This method is significant as it can be used to elucidate structure-function relationships of gene delivery nanoparticles and improve their efficiency. This method was applied to a particular type of biodegradable polymer, a poly(beta-amino ester), that transfected human brain cancer cells with high efficacy and without cytotoxicity. A four-compartment first order mass-action kinetics model was found to model the experimental transport data well without requiring external fitting parameters. Quantitative rate constants were identified for the intracellular transport, including DNA degradation rate from polyplexes, cellular uptake rate, and nuclear uptake rate, with cellular uptake identified as the rate-limiting step.

Indexed as

PlasmidsPolymersCell Line, TumorFlow CytometryGlioblastomaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansNanoparticlesTransfectionenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent Proteinspoly(beta-amino ester)PolymersBrain cancerComputational modelingGene deliveryNanoparticlePolymer

Identifiers

PMID27019146
PMCPMC5061650
OpenAlexW2308170743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.