Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27019015›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2016

Agouti-related peptide neural circuits mediate adaptive behaviors in the starved state.

Stephanie L Padilla, Jian Qiu, Marta E Soden, Elisenda Sanz, Casey C Nestor, Forrest D Barker, Albert Quintana, Larry S Zweifel, Oline K Rønnekleiv, Martin J Kelly and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephanie L PadillaHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jian QiuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Marta E SodenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elisenda SanzInstitut de Neurociències and Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Casey C NestorDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Forrest D BarkerHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Albert QuintanaInstitut de Neurociències and Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1674-7160
Larry S ZweifelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and the Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Oline K RønnekleivDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Martin J KellyDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Richard D PalmiterHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Sex Differences in the Control of FeedingR01DK068098 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLY, MARTIN JEFFREY, RØNNEKLEIV, OLINE KARIN · 2005 to 2024
$7.1M
BETA ENDORPHIN NEURONS AND THE CONTROL OF HOMEOSTASISR01NS038809 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KELLY, MARTIN JEFFREY · 1999 to 2018
$6.8M
Effect of Killing or Removing GABA from NPY/AgRP NeuronsR01DA024908 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PALMITER, RICHARD D. · 2007 to 2021
$3.5M
Functional Mapping of Dopamine-Dependent Fear Circuitry Through Advanced GeneticR01MH094536 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZWEIFEL, LARRY S · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024908NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068098NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094536NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of starvation, animals will engage in high-risk behaviors that would normally be considered maladaptive. Starving rodents, for example, will forage in areas that are more susceptible to predators and will also modulate aggressive behavior within a territory of limited or depleted nutrients. The neural basis of these adaptive behaviors likely involves circuits that link innate feeding, aggression and fear. Hypothalamic agouti-related peptide (AgRP)-expressing neurons are critically important for driving feeding and project axons to brain regions implicated in aggression and fear. Using circuit-mapping techniques in mice, we define a disynaptic network originating from a subset of AgRP neurons that project to the medial nucleus of the amygdala and then to the principal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, which suppresses territorial aggression and reduces contextual fear. We propose that AgRP neurons serve as a master switch capable of coordinating behavioral decisions relative to internal state and environmental cues.

Indexed as

AggressionAgouti-Related ProteinAmygdalaAnimalsFearGene Knock-In TechniquesHypothalamusMaleMiceNeural PathwaysNeuronsPeptide FragmentsSeptal NucleiStarvationagouti-related peptide, (Yc(CRFFNAFC)Y)Agouti-Related ProteinPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID27019015
PMCPMC4846501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.